Estate of Joseph L. Mangiardi v. Commissioner of IRS

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedOctober 12, 2011
Docket11-11609
StatusUnpublished

This text of Estate of Joseph L. Mangiardi v. Commissioner of IRS (Estate of Joseph L. Mangiardi v. Commissioner of IRS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Estate of Joseph L. Mangiardi v. Commissioner of IRS, (11th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT OCT 12, 2011 No. 11-11609 JOHN LEY ________________________ CLERK

Tax Court No. 3958-08L

ESTATE OF JOSEPH L. MANGIARDI, DECEASED,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

COMMISSIONER OF IRS,

Respondent-Appellee.

________________

Appeal from a Decision of the United States Tax Court _________________

(October 12, 2011)

Before TJOFLAT and CARNES, Circuit Judges, and MICKLE,* District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

* Honorable Stephan P. Mickle, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Florida, sitting by designation. The estate of Joseph L. Magiardi appeals the United States Tax Court’s

ruling upholding the Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s decision to collect the

estate’s unpaid federal estate tax liability by levy. The estate argues that the

Internal Revenue Service Office of Appeals abused its discretion when it rejected

the estate’s offer to settle that unpaid tax liability, which totaled more than $3

million, for the estate’s remaining assets, worth $700,000. According to the

estate, the Office of Appeals abused its discretion because it misapplied the law

(1) when it considered the potential to collect more than the offered $700,000 by

pursuing assets that had already been transferred to beneficiaries of the estate; (2)

by incorrectly valuing those transferees’ liability; and (3) by failing to quantify the

amount that the IRS could reasonably expect to collect from those transferees.

After considering the arguments of the parties, we agree with the Tax Court

that the IRS Office of Appeals did not abuse its discretion as the estate contends.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Estate of Joseph L. Mangiardi v. Commissioner of IRS, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-joseph-l-mangiardi-v-commissioner-of-irs-ca11-2011.