Estate of John Grigorian, by and through successor in interest, Blake Grigorian; Blake Grigorian, individually v. County of Los Angeles, a public entity, Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department; Sheriff Robert G. Luna, in his individual and official capacities; Morees Valdez, an individual, and Does 1 through 10, individually, jointly and severally

CourtDistrict Court, C.D. California
DecidedOctober 20, 2025
Docket2:25-cv-03301
StatusUnknown

This text of Estate of John Grigorian, by and through successor in interest, Blake Grigorian; Blake Grigorian, individually v. County of Los Angeles, a public entity, Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department; Sheriff Robert G. Luna, in his individual and official capacities; Morees Valdez, an individual, and Does 1 through 10, individually, jointly and severally (Estate of John Grigorian, by and through successor in interest, Blake Grigorian; Blake Grigorian, individually v. County of Los Angeles, a public entity, Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department; Sheriff Robert G. Luna, in his individual and official capacities; Morees Valdez, an individual, and Does 1 through 10, individually, jointly and severally) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Estate of John Grigorian, by and through successor in interest, Blake Grigorian; Blake Grigorian, individually v. County of Los Angeles, a public entity, Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department; Sheriff Robert G. Luna, in his individual and official capacities; Morees Valdez, an individual, and Does 1 through 10, individually, jointly and severally, (C.D. Cal. 2025).

Opinion

! || Denisse O. Gastélum, SBN 282771 Christian Contreras, SBN 330269 7 || Selene Estrada-Villela, SBN 354994 LAW OFFICES OF CHRISTIAN CONTRERA‘ GASTELUM LAW, APC PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION 3 || A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 360 E. 2nd St., 8th Floor 3767 Worsham Ave. Los Angeles. California 90012 4 || Long Beach, California 90808 Tel: (323) 435-8000 Tel: (213) 340-6112 Fax: (G23) 597-0101 5 || Fax: G1 3) 402-8622 Email: CC@Contreras-Law.com Email: dgastelum@gastelumfirm.com 6 7 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, ESTATE OF JOHN GRIGORIAN, by and through successor in interest, BLAKE g || GRIGORIAN; BLAKE GRIGORIAN, individually 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1] ESTATE OF JOHN GRIGORIAN, by ) CASE NO. 2:25-cv—03301-MWF-AGR 12 |} and through successor in interest, [Assigned to the Hon. Michael W. BLAKE GRIGORIAN; BLAKE itzgerald, District Judge; Referred to the 13 || GRIGORIAN, individually Hon. Alicia G. Rosenberg, Magistrate Judge] 14 Plaintiffs, 15 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER V. 16 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a 17 public entity, LOS ANGELES OUNTY SHERIFF’S 18 || DEPARTMENT; SHERIFF ROBERT G. LUNA, in his individual and 19 || official capacities; MOREES VALDEZ, an individual, and DOES 1 20 || through 10, individually, jointly and severally, 21 Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

1. A.PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 2 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 3 || proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 4 || disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be 5 || warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter 6 || the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order 7 does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited 9 information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable 10 legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to a file confidential " information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be "2 followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 4 B. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT Is Plaintiffs and Defendants may produce certain documents in this case that 16 contain or relate to personal information, medical information, investigation records, 17 || law enforcement safety objectives,or financial information. Such information may 18 || implicate the privacy interests of the party and are properly protected through a Fed. 19 || R. Civ. P. 26(c) protective order. Seattle Times Co. v. Rhinehart, 467 U.S. 20, 35 n.21 20 || (1984) (“Rule 26(c) includes among its express purposes the protection of a ‘party or 21 || person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression or undue burden or expense.’ 97 || Although the Rule contains no specific reference to privacy or to other rights or 93 || interests that may be implicated, such matters are implicit in the broad purpose and 74 || language of the Rule.”); Soto v. City of Concord, 162 F.R.D. 603, 617 (N.D. Cal. 95 1995) (a party’s privacy rights are to be protected through a “carefully crafted 6 protective order.”). 4 2. DEFINITIONS

2.1 Action: This pending federal law suit, Estate of John Grigorian et al. v.

1 County of Los Angeles, et al., Case No. 2:25-CV-03301-MWF-AGR. 2 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation 3 of information or items under this Order. 4 2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of 5 how it is generated, stored, or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for 6 protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the 7 Good Cause Statement. 8 2.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as 9 their support staff). 10 2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or 11 items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as 12 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 13 2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless 14 of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, 15 among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or 16 generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 17 2.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 18 pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as 19 an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 20 2.8 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action. 21 House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside 22 counsel. 23 2.9 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or 24 other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 25 2.10 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party 26 to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and have 27 appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which 28 has appeared on behalf of that party, including support staff. 1 2.11 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, 2 employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their 3 support staffs). 4 2.12 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or 5 Discovery Material in this Action. 6 2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support 7 services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or 8 demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) 9 and their employees and subcontractors. 10 2.14 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is 11 designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 12 2.15 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material 13 from a Producing Party. 14 3. SCOPE 15 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only 16 Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or 17 compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or 18 presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. 19 Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by the orders of the 20 trial judge. This Order does not govern the use of Protected Material at trial. 21 4. DURATION 22 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations 23 imposed by this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees 24 otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be 25 deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and defenses in this Action, with 26 or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion and 27 exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this Action, 28 1 including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time 2 pursuant to applicable law. 3 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 4 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under 5 this Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that 6 qualifies under the appropriate standards.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Seattle Times Co. v. Rhinehart
467 U.S. 20 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Soto v. City of Concord
162 F.R.D. 603 (N.D. California, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Estate of John Grigorian, by and through successor in interest, Blake Grigorian; Blake Grigorian, individually v. County of Los Angeles, a public entity, Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department; Sheriff Robert G. Luna, in his individual and official capacities; Morees Valdez, an individual, and Does 1 through 10, individually, jointly and severally, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-john-grigorian-by-and-through-successor-in-interest-blake-cacd-2025.