Estate of Jessie Ring Garrett v. Commissioner

12 T.C.M. 1142, 1953 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 95
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedOctober 7, 1953
DocketDocket No. 35955.
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 12 T.C.M. 1142 (Estate of Jessie Ring Garrett v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Estate of Jessie Ring Garrett v. Commissioner, 12 T.C.M. 1142, 1953 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 95 (tax 1953).

Opinion

Estate of Jessie Ring Garrett, Deceased, Edward I. Garrett, Executor v. Commissioner.
Estate of Jessie Ring Garrett v. Commissioner
Docket No. 35955.
United States Tax Court
1953 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 95; 12 T.C.M. (CCH) 1142; T.C.M. (RIA) 53329;
October 7, 1953
*95

1. The decedent, who died in March 1947, owned one-eighth of the stock of a family corporation which owned one-sixth of the stock of a logging company. The logging company was exhausting its timber available for lumber but owned considerable timber usable for pulp. In 1946 and 1947 discussions were carried on concerning the sale of its assets or its stock. In November 1947 the sale of a controlling interest in the logging company's stock was consummated. The family corporation was dissolved and its assets distributed. In August 1948 on liquidation of the logging company the decedent's estate received $357,443.27 the interest derived from the family corporation's common stock. The estate tax return valued this stock at $63,055.43. Held, the value of decedent's stock was $357,443.27.

2. Value of other stocks determined.

3. The decedent furnished most of the funds for building a new residence in 1936. Her husband, to equalize their contributions, gave her a ten-year non-interest bearing note and made book entries indicating that he owned her $28,000. The decedent destroyed the note and requested elimination of the book record, which was done, and a gift tax return was filed shortly before *96 her death reporting forgiveness of the debt as a gift. Held, this transaction was not a gift made in contemplation of death.

4. The decedent promised her son to pay monthly amounts if he would rent and occupy a certain residence near her. She made three payments before her death. Held, the son's compliance was not a consideration in money or money's worth and did not create a debt due him by the decedent.

5. At the executor's request the Court ordered payment from the estate of $400 per month for the care and support of the decedent's adopted daughter to continue during administration. Held, this allowance is deductible as a payment for the support of dependents.

H. B. Jones, Esq., 610 Colman Building, Seattle, Wash., Albert Olsen, Esq., and A. R. Kehoe, Esq., for the petitioner. John H. Pigg, Esq., for the respondent.

TIETJENS

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

TIETJENS, Judge: The respondent determined a deficiency in estate tax of $148,717.94. After concessions and stipulations the issues are reduced to six, three of which relate to the valuation of certain stocks. The remaining issues are whether the forgiveness of a debt said to have been owed by the decedent's husband *97 was a transfer made in contemplation of death, whether a claim of the decedent's son is an allowable deduction as a debt of the decedent, and whether a support allowance paid for the benefit of the decedent's adopted daughter is an allowable deduction. Some of the facts are stipulated. The return was filed with the collector of internal revenue at Tacoma, Washington.

Findings of Fact

The stipulated facts are so found and the stipulation and exhibits attached are incorporated herein by reference.

Jessie Ring Garrett, the decedent, died at Seattle, Washington, on March 22, 1947, leaving an estate subject to probate in King County, Washington, and leaving a last will and testament naming Edward I. Garrett, the decedent's husband, as executor. The will was duly admitted to probate and Edward I. Garrett was duly appointed and since has been the duly qualified and acting executor of such last will and testament and of the estate of the decedent.

The decedent was the daughter of Clark L. Ring and Elizabeth Merrill, and was the sister of Elizabeth Ring Mather. She was the mother of Edward Peter Garrett and Rose Ring Nelson, and grandmother of Jessie Anne Nelson, who was legally adopted by *98 Edward I. Garrett and the decedent as their daughter. Elizabeth Merrill was the sister of Richard D. Merrill. The Ring and Merrill families had extensive interests in timber operations in the Pacific Northwestern States and Canada.

The decedent's will was dated November 16, 1944. It was amended by two codicils dated April 1, 1946, and October 31, 1946. By the will, as amended, the residue of the estate after certain specific bequests was devised in trust to the People's National Bank of Washington, Edward I. Garrett and Edward Peter Garrett as Trustees, under broad powers of management. It was provided that from the annual income $400 per month should be paid Jessie Anne Nelson and the remainder paid to Edward I. Garrett during his life. Upon his death, one half the income was to be distributed to Edward Peter Garrett and the remainder to Jessie Anne Nelson except for any amount necessary for the support of her mother, Rose Ring Nelson, who had substantial means of her own. The will appointed Edward I. Garrett as executor and authorized him to take possession and proceed to allow and pay or reject all claims and to administer the estate and distribute the estate according to the will *99 without the intervention or supervision of any court except to admit the will to probate, direct the publication of notice to creditors, receive the inventory, appoint appraisers and enter a decree of solvency and to take such steps as may be required by state law to enable the executor to administer the estate without the further intervention or supervision of any court.

On or before June 22, 1948, the executor filed an estate tax return for the estate of the decedent, adopting the date of death as the basic valuation date. The return listed as property owned by the decedent a half interest in the family home and grounds, 39 descriptions of stocks and bonds, cash in five bank accounts, certain bonds, stock or notes owned jointly by the decedent and her sister, and various miscellaneous assets, including interests in community property. Among the stocks listed were 1,251 1/3 shares of Clark L. Ring Corporation common valued at $50.39 per share, or $63,055.43; 2,852 shares of Clark L.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Campana v. Commissioner of Revenue
524 N.E.2d 113 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 T.C.M. 1142, 1953 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 95, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-jessie-ring-garrett-v-commissioner-tax-1953.