Estate of Jennings
This text of 1 Coffey 155 (Estate of Jennings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is manifest from the offer of Mr. Fruchey’s attorney to increase his bid of $3,000 to $5,000, that the price obtained at the sale was greatly disproportionate to the value of the articles sold. I have fully considered all the points made by counsel on both sides, in oral argument and in briefs, and, while conceding the cogency of Mr. Wood’s presentation of views, cannot consider it conclusive. I adhere to the view intimated by me at the hearing, as the correct conclusion—the sale cannot be confirmed; and a new sale should take place under circumstances calculated to bring the utmost value of the property.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Coffey 155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-jennings-calsuppctsf-1883.