Estate of Hyde

30 P. 804, 64 Cal. 228, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 606
California Supreme Court·Decided October 11, 1883·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

L. A. Evans petitioned, as creditor, for letters of administration. M. P. Cutler petitioned for letters as public administrator. The petitions were heard together, and on the hearing the said Evans produced a written request from the father and heir of the estate that letters be granted to him, Evans. The father was a non-resident of this State. The court made an order that letters issue to Evans, and from this order Cutler appealed.

This was error. (See §§ 1369 and 1379, Code Civ. Proc.; also Estate of Cotter, 54 Cal. 217; Estate of Kelly, 57 Cal. 81; Estate of Morgan, 53 Cal. 245; Estate of Beech, 63 Cal. 458.)

The order is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Estate of Hyde, 30 P. 804, 64 Cal. 228, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 606 (Cal. 1883).

30 P. 804 (Estate of Hyde) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Estate of Griffiths
3 Coffey 545 (California Superior Court, San Francisco County, 1895)
In re Estate of Bergin
3 Coffey 288 (California Superior Court, San Francisco County, 1893)
In re Estate of Bedell
32 P. 323 (California Supreme Court, 1893)
In re Estate of Bedell
3 Coffey 78 (California Superior Court, San Francisco County, 1892)