Estate of Hickey

5 Coffey 433
CourtSuperior Court of California, County of San Francisco
DecidedFebruary 15, 1897
DocketNo. 17,388
StatusPublished

This text of 5 Coffey 433 (Estate of Hickey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Estate of Hickey, 5 Coffey 433 (Cal. Super. Ct. 1897).

Opinion

Administrator’s Account—Vacation of Settlement—Affidavit of Merits.—An affidavit of merits is not indispensable upon an application to set aside an order and decree settling an administrator’s account, because taken against minors through their inadvertence and excusable neglect, when the merits appear on the face of the record.

Administrator’s Account—Vacation of Settlement—Power to Order. A superior court has authority to vacate its order and decree settling an administrator’s account, when an application therefor is made at once, and it appears from the record that the order has been improperly made against minors who, while represented by attorney, were improperly represented.

Distribution of Estate—Notice.—There is No Direction in section 1665 of the Code of Civil Procedure that the distribution of the estate of a decedent should be made without notice.

Estate of Hickey was before the supreme court in 129 Cal. 14, 61 Pac. 475.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Estate of Hickey
61 P. 475 (California Supreme Court, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Coffey 433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-hickey-calsuppctsf-1897.