Estate of Hershkowitz v. Walker
This text of 192 Misc. 2d 340 (Estate of Hershkowitz v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[341]*341OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order unanimously reversed with $10 costs, and motion to vacate the default judgment, dismiss the petition and restore tenant to possession granted.
The petitioner, an estate of a decedent who was a Florida domiciliary, commenced the instant holdover proceeding to recover possession of a cooperative apartment located within Kings County, New York. While the estate’s personal representatives were apparently duly appointed by a Florida court having jurisdiction over the estate, the estate’s personal representatives apparently did not obtain ancillary letters from New York appointing them as ancillary fiduciaries (see, SCPA 206 [1]; 1602 [1]; 1607, 1610 [1]). Inasmuch as an estate is not a legal entity, and any action by an estate must be by an executor or administrator in his representative capacity (Estate of Fenton v Rich, NYLJ, Apr. 2, 2001, at 34, col 6 [App Term, 2d & 11th Jud Dists]; 100 W. 72nd St. Assoc. v Murphy, 144 Misc 2d 1036; see, EPTL 11-3.1) and this proceeding was not brought by an executor or administrator duly authorized to act within New York, and none has been made a party, tenant’s motion to vacate the default judgment, dismiss the petition and restore her to possession should have been granted.
Patterson, J.P., Golia and Rios, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
192 Misc. 2d 340, 746 N.Y.S.2d 228, 2002 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1009, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-hershkowitz-v-walker-nyappterm-2002.