Estate of Heppenstall

22 A. 860, 144 Pa. 259, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 606
York County Orphans' Court·Decided October 5, 1891·No. No. 432·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

Pee Ctteiam :

We are of opinion that under the will of John Heppenstall, deceased, his widow took his personal estate absolutely, as widow and legatee, and not as executrix : Markley’s Est., 132 Pa. 352; Gold’s Est., 133 Pa. 495. This disposes of the first assignment. It follows that, in the account of the surviving executor of John Heppenstall, he is chargeable only with such personal property of his testator as remained after the death of his widow. This covers the second assignment, and those that remain do not [266]*266require notice. Tbe case was disposed of in an accurate and intelligent manner by the learned judge of the court below.

Decree affirmed, and the appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Estate of Heppenstall, 22 A. 860, 144 Pa. 259, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 606 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1891).

22 A. 860 (Estate of Heppenstall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Horner v. Penrod
1 Pa. D. & C.3d 83 (Somerset County Court of Common Pleas, 1975)
Moltrup Estate
225 A.2d 676 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1967)
Hays Estate
55 A.2d 763 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1947)
Stone's Estate
57 Pa. D. & C. 284 (Mercer County Orphans' Court, 1946)
Crutcher v. Joyce
134 F.2d 809 (Tenth Circuit, 1943)
Flannery's Estate
44 Pa. D. & C. 197 (Allegheny County Orphans' Court, 1941)
Powell's Estate
17 A.2d 391 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1940)
Evans v. Ockershausen
100 F.2d 695 (D.C. Circuit, 1938)
Long v. Uhl
8 Pa. D. & C. 671 (Centre County Court of Common Pleas, 1926)
Simpson's Estate
34 Pa. Super. 115 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1907)
Zimmerman's Estate
23 Pa. Super. 130 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1903)