Estate of Heatley

5 Coffey 433
CourtSuperior Court of California, County of San Francisco
DecidedJuly 24, 1897
DocketNo. 18,828
StatusPublished

This text of 5 Coffey 433 (Estate of Heatley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Estate of Heatley, 5 Coffey 433 (Cal. Super. Ct. 1897).

Opinion

Olographic Will—Insufficient Signature.—The fact that a testamentary paper is commenced and also indorsed in the handwriting of the testator, “This is my Will,” is unavailing to constitute it an olographic will if not signed.

Olographic Will—Insufficient Signature.—A testamentary instrument in the handwriting of the testator, not having any signature, but containing the testator’s name in an unwitnessed attestation clause, cannot be given effect as an olographic will.

Olographic Will—Attestation Clause.—If one makes a will entirely in his own handwriting, does not sign it, and attaches an attestation clause unsubscribed by witnesses, the presumption is that he intends to acknowledge and publish it in the presence of witnesses, and it is therefore incomplete as a testamentary paper.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Coffey 433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-heatley-calsuppctsf-1897.