Estate of Haid v. Knight

215 S.W.3d 206, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1880, 2006 WL 3590338
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 12, 2006·No. No. WD 66310·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Nelson Knight appeals a judgment entered against him following a bench trial of his action in quantum meruit against the estate of Bernice Haid. After a bench trial on the merits, the trial court entered a judgment in which it concluded that the services of Knight and his wife1 were not gratuitously provided, but that Haid had paid for those services during her lifetime. Knight claims that the trial court erred in considering various payments made during Haid’s lifetime, because those payments involved separate transactions. Since a review of the transcript and judgment reveals that Knight failed to establish that Haid had not paid the reasonable value of Knight’s services, the judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Estate of Haid v. Knight, 215 S.W.3d 206, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1880, 2006 WL 3590338 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

215 S.W.3d 206 (Estate of Haid v. Knight) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.