Estate of Hagen v. Commissioner

1969 T.C. Memo. 59, 28 T.C.M. 341, 1969 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 237
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedMarch 25, 1969
DocketDocket Nos. 1890-66, 1891-66.
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1969 T.C. Memo. 59 (Estate of Hagen v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Estate of Hagen v. Commissioner, 1969 T.C. Memo. 59, 28 T.C.M. 341, 1969 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 237 (tax 1969).

Opinion

Estate of John C. Hagen, Jr., Deceased, Seattle First National Bank, Executor, and Mary Hagen, Petitioners v. Commissioner. Fred J. Hagen and Floy J. Hagen, Petitioners v. Commissioner.
Estate of Hagen v. Commissioner
Docket Nos. 1890-66, 1891-66.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1969-59; 1969 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 237; 28 T.C.M. (CCH) 341; T.C.M. (RIA) 69059;
March 25, 1969, Filed
*237 Allen A. Bowden, 1103 Norton Bldg., 801 Second Ave., Seattle, Wash., for the petitioners. Eugene H. Flood, for the respondent.

BRUCE

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

BRUCE, Judge: These consolidated cases involve deficiencies determined by respondent for the year 1964 in the income taxes of John C. Hagen and wife, Mary Hagen, in the amount of $5,291.06, and of Fred J. Hagen and wife, Floy J. Hagen, in the amount of $5,142.75. The only issue presented is whether a payment of $475,000 in full discharge of an indebtedness in the principal amount of $455,000 and accrued interest in the amount of $99,513.24 is to be allocated proportionately to principal and interest, as determined by respondent, or is to be allocated first to principal and the remainder to interest, as contended by petitioners.

Findings of Fact

The stipulation of facts and exhibits attached thereto are incorporated herein by this reference.

John C. Hagen, Jr., and his wife, Mary Hagen, were residents of Seattle, Washington, and timely filed a joint Federal income tax return for the year 1964 with the district director of internal revenue at Tacoma, Washington. John C. Hagen, Jr., died March 18, 1966, subsequent*238 to the issuance of the notice of deficiency herein, and the Seattle First National Bank, with its principal office in Seattle, Washington, duly qualified as executor of his estate. Mary continued to reside in Seattle at the time her petition herein was filed. 342

Fred J. Hagen and his wife, Floy J. Hagen, were residents of Seattle, Washington, at the time their petition herein was filed. They timely filed a joint Federal income tax return for the year 1964 with the district director of internal revenue at Tacoma, Washington.

In a document labeled "Agreement of Doric Creditors," dated September 19, 1962, The Doric Company, a Washington corporation, acknowledged and agreed to pay, at the rate of $10,000 or more per month, certain obligations totalling $735,000, plus 7 percent interest from July 15, 1962. The obligations referred to consisted of four prior obligations, then in default, owed by Furniture Leasing Corporation and Cirod, Inc., subsidiaries of The Doric Company, and guaranteed by The Doric Company and its principal stockholders, Floyd Clodfelter and Ray Lemery, described in the "Agreement of Doric Creditors" as follows:

(2) All of the obligations owed to Hagen-Trustee, *239 the Hagens, Nancy Ann Hagen, and J. C. Hagen, Sr., guaranteed by Doric, consist of all amounts owed to them by the following corporations (including interest to July 15, 1962):

(a) Balance owing in the amount of $82,092.67 on that certain promissory note dated April 1, 1962, in the principal amount of $270,000.00, executed by Furniture Leasing Corporation, and payable to Robert M. Hagen, Patricia Hagen, J. R. Bennett, Mary Jane Bennett, Joseph J. Pfeiffer, Mary E. Pfeiffer, John C. Hagen, Jr., William P. Hagen and Fred J. Hagen.

(b) Balance owing by Cirod, Inc., a Washington corporation, in the amount of $530,407.33 to J. C. Hagen, Jr., Trustee (successor to Crystal Land Company), under that certain agreement entitled "Grosvenor Agreement," dated March 2, 1961, between Cirod, Inc., and Crystal Land Company.

(c) Balance owing by Cirod, Inc., a Washington corporation, in the amount of $72,500.00 to J. C. Hagen, Jr., William P. Hagen and Fred J. Hagen, under that certain agreement entitled "Mayflower Option Sale Agreement," executed contemporaneously herewith.

(d) Balance owing in the amount of $50,000.00 on that certain promissory note dated December 8, 1958, in the principal*240 amount of $50,000.00, executed by Cirod, Inc., a Washington corporation, to Nancy Ann Hagen.

Said agreement further provides:

Hagen-Trustee, the Hagens, Nancy Ann Hagen, and J. C. Hagen, Sr., agree to accept from Doric, and Doric agrees to pay on the above obligations, $10,000.00 or more per month to Hagen-Trustee, said payments to be applied first to principal of all obligations listed above and then to interest which has been earned on said obligations. Interest on unpaid balances of principal shall be 7% per annum from July 15, 1962, with unpaid balances of interest being compounded monthly, but in no event shall the total interest paid by Doric under this agreement exceed the interest which would have been due if the monthly payments of $10,000.00 had been applied to interest and then principal at the rate of 7% per annum on unpaid balances. After default, interest shall be 12% per annum on unpaid balances. The monthly payments shall be payable on the 15th day of each month commencing on November 15, 1962; provided, however, that the entire balance of principal and interest remaining unpaid on July 15, 1967, shall be paid in full on that date. Any provision providing for interest*241 in any existing agreement is hereby succeeded by the 7% interest rate provided for herein.

Provided further, that if Doric should default in any of the said payments and remain in default for more than 30 days, or shall have made an assignment for the benefit of its creditors, or have been declared or adjudicated bankrupt by a court having jurisdiction in matters of bankruptcy, or if a receiver be appointed for Doric, or if any proceeding should be brought to foreclose any lien which is prior to that held by the Hagens, all amounts owing on obligations listed in this Section (2) shall, at the option of Hagen-Trustee, become immediately due and payable, and Hagen-Trustee may collect the full amount due from the original debtor corporation, or its guarantors, or Doric, or all of them, and each shall be jointly and severally liable.

Hagen-Trustee shall apply amounts received from the monthly payments provided herein to the discharge of the obligations in the order they are listed above in this Section (2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

O'Dell v. Commissioner
26 T.C. 592 (U.S. Tax Court, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1969 T.C. Memo. 59, 28 T.C.M. 341, 1969 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-hagen-v-commissioner-tax-1969.