Estate of Goldman v. Hertz Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Estate of Goldman v. Hertz Corp.

29 A.D.2d 523, 286 N.Y.S.2d 215, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2775

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 14, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 29 A.D.2d 523 (Estate of Goldman v. Hertz Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Estate of Goldman v. Hertz Corp., 29 A.D.2d 523, 286 N.Y.S.2d 215, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2775 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment in favor of plaintiffs for $20,973.80 in a wrongful death action, unanimously reversed, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, and a new trial as to damages only, granted, without costs and without disbursements, unless plaintiffs, within 20 days from the date of the order entered herein, stipulate to accept the sum of $12,473.80 in lieu of award by verdict, in which event the judgment is modified to that extent and as thus modified, affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. It is obvious that the award of $20,973.80 is grossly excessive and not warranted by the record. Concur — Steuer, J. P., Tilzer, Rabin, McGivern and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment in favor of plaintiffs for $20,973.80 in a wrongful death action, unanimously reversed, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, and a new trial as to damages only, granted, without costs and without disbursements, unless plaintiffs, within 20 days from the date of the order entered herein, stipulate to accept the sum of $12,473.80 in lieu of award by verdict, in which event the judgment is modified to that extent and as thus modified, affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. It is obvious that the award of $20,973.80 is grossly excessive and not warranted by the record. Concur — Steuer, J. P., Tilzer, Rabin, McGivern and Bastow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 A.D.2d 523, 286 N.Y.S.2d 215, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-goldman-v-hertz-corp-nyappdiv-1967.