Estate of Garcia v. JPMorgan Chase Bank

165 So. 3d 33, 2015 WL 1945038
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 29, 2015·No. No. 3D14-298·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Ramos v. Philip Morris Cos., Inc., 743 So.2d 24, 30-31 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (“The statute of limitations is an affirmative defense which must be plead and proved by the defendant, and is waived if not plead.”) (citations omitted); see also Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.110(d); Barnett Bank v. Estate of Read, 493 So.2d 447, 448 (Fla.1986); Aboandandolo v. Vonella, 88 So.2d 282, 284 (Fla.1956); Snow v. Wells Fargo, 156 So.3d 538 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015); Comerica Bank & Trust v. SDI Operating Partners, 673 So.2d 163, 166 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Estate of Garcia v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, 165 So. 3d 33, 2015 WL 1945038 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

165 So. 3d 33 (Estate of Garcia v. JPMorgan Chase Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ramos v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.
743 So. 2d 24 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Comerica Bank v. SDI Operating Partners
673 So. 2d 163 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Barnett Bank v. Estate of Read
493 So. 2d 447 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
Aboandandolo v. Vonella
88 So. 2d 282 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1956)
Snow v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
156 So. 3d 538 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)