Estate of Frazier
7 Pa. Super. 473, 1898 Pa. Super. LEXIS 326
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 29, 1898·No. Appeal, No. 196·Published·Cited by 14 cases
Opinion
There having been no stay of proceedings pending the rule to show cause, it did not stop the running of the statute, and the appeal must be quashed because it was not taken within six months from the date of the decree.
Appeal quashed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Estate of Frazier, 7 Pa. Super. 473, 1898 Pa. Super. LEXIS 326 (Pa. Ct. App. 1898).
7 Pa. Super. 473 (Estate of Frazier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Com. v. Barony, N.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2017
Silver v. Scaltrito
361 A.2d 705 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1976)
Hanna Estate
80 A.2d 740 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1951)
Baily Petition
76 A.2d 645 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1950)
Thomas v. McLean
76 A.2d 413 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1950)
Philadelphia Suburban Transportation Co. v. DiFrancesco
66 A.2d 254 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1949)
Rutherford v. Rutherford
32 A.2d 921 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1943)
Bobbitt's Estate
200 A. 279 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)
Chester School District v. Richardson & Luce, Inc.
182 A. 500 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Ellenberger v. State Workmen's Insurance Fund
18 Pa. D. & C. 273 (Alleghany County Court of Common Pleas, 1932)
Henry's Estate
139 A. 198 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1927)
Haller's Case
44 Pa. Super. 481 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1910)
Groff v. City Saving Fund & Trust Co.
38 Pa. Super. 567 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1909)
Winter Avenue
23 Pa. Super. 353 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1903)