Estate of Frank Duttenhofer, Deceased, Albert J. Uhlenbrock and William Duttenhofer, Co-Executors v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

410 F.2d 302, 23 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1916, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12613
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedApril 29, 1969
Docket18804_1
StatusPublished
Cited by81 cases

This text of 410 F.2d 302 (Estate of Frank Duttenhofer, Deceased, Albert J. Uhlenbrock and William Duttenhofer, Co-Executors v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Estate of Frank Duttenhofer, Deceased, Albert J. Uhlenbrock and William Duttenhofer, Co-Executors v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 410 F.2d 302, 23 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1916, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12613 (6th Cir. 1969).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the briefs and records filed in the above-styled appeal, and the memorandum opinion of the Tax Court, filed December 13, 1967, 49 T.C. 200, we affirm the judgment of the Tax Court.

In this case there was a delay of over five months in the filing of the estate tax return beyond the 15-month period allowed by statute. The Tax Court found on the facts in this case that neither the litigation in which the estate was involved nor the executprs’ reliance upon their attorney constituted “reasonable cause” for failure either to file the return or make timely request for an extension.

In Fisk v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 203 F.2d 358 (6th Cir. 1953), a penalty was assessed for an estate tax return which was mailed on the last day allowed by the statute but was received one day late. This court reversed, holding that the delay there involved was an innocent error made despite reasonable care. A five-month delay does not appear to us to present a comparable situation.

We cannot hold on this record that the findings of fact of the Tax Court in this case are “clearly erroneous.” Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Duberstein, 363 U.S. 278, 80 S.Ct. 1190, 4 L.Ed.2d 1218 (1960).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Daniel E. Larkin & Christine L. Larkin v. Commissioner
2020 T.C. Memo. 70 (U.S. Tax Court, 2020)
Ozimkoski v. Comm'r
2016 T.C. Memo. 228 (U.S. Tax Court, 2016)
Estate of Liftin v. United States
754 F.3d 975 (Federal Circuit, 2014)
Ajah v. Comm'r
2010 T.C. Summary Opinion 90 (U.S. Tax Court, 2010)
BRUECHER v. COMMISSIONER
2005 T.C. Summary Opinion 52 (U.S. Tax Court, 2005)
Estate of Hartsell v. Comm'r
2004 T.C. Memo. 211 (U.S. Tax Court, 2004)
ESTATE OF MICHAEL J. THOMAS v. COMMISSIONER
2001 T.C. Memo. 225 (U.S. Tax Court, 2001)
Duncan v. Commissioner
2000 T.C. Memo. 269 (U.S. Tax Court, 2000)
Estate of Eddy v. Commissioner
115 T.C. No. 10 (U.S. Tax Court, 2000)
Estate of Edward H. Eddy v. Commissioner
115 T.C. No. 10 (U.S. Tax Court, 2000)
Ahadpour v. Commissioner
2000 T.C. Memo. 68 (U.S. Tax Court, 2000)
Karara v. Commissioner
1999 T.C. Memo. 253 (U.S. Tax Court, 1999)
McGuirl v. Comm'r
1999 T.C. Memo. 21 (U.S. Tax Court, 1999)
Morrissey v. Commissioner
1998 T.C. Memo. 443 (U.S. Tax Court, 1998)
Harrison v. Commissioner
1998 T.C. Memo. 417 (U.S. Tax Court, 1998)
Estate of Mehrafsar v. Commissioner
1996 T.C. Memo. 351 (U.S. Tax Court, 1996)
McPike v. Commissioner
1996 T.C. Memo. 46 (U.S. Tax Court, 1996)
Boatman v. Commissioner
1995 T.C. Memo. 356 (U.S. Tax Court, 1995)
Estate of Cavenaugh v. Commissioner
100 T.C. No. 27 (U.S. Tax Court, 1993)
Estate of La Meres v. Comm'r
98 T.C. No. 24 (U.S. Tax Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
410 F.2d 302, 23 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1916, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-frank-duttenhofer-deceased-albert-j-uhlenbrock-and-william-ca6-1969.