Estate of Elrod v. State ex rel. Adult & Family Services Division

714 P.2d 1116, 78 Or. App. 183
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedFebruary 26, 1986
Docket2492-A; CA A35742
StatusPublished

This text of 714 P.2d 1116 (Estate of Elrod v. State ex rel. Adult & Family Services Division) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Estate of Elrod v. State ex rel. Adult & Family Services Division, 714 P.2d 1116, 78 Or. App. 183 (Or. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Decedent had received old age assistance benefits and medical care from the state. The state filed two claims against her estate to recover compensation for the assistance provided. Shortly before her death, neighbors had obtained her signature on a deed which conveyed her personal residence, her only significant asset, to them. The personal representative for the estate hired an attorney, under a 40 percent contingency fee agreement, to file an action to set aside the conveyance for lack of consideration. The conveyance was set aside, and the state’s claims were allowed. However, the probate court reduced the state’s recovery by 40 percent to reflect the attorney fees. The state argues that the fees were an administrative expense incurred by the personal representative and should have been charged against the whole estate in accordance with the priority statute and not charged directly and solely to the property recovered. See ORS 115.125. We agree.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 115.125
Oregon § 115.125

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
714 P.2d 1116, 78 Or. App. 183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-elrod-v-state-ex-rel-adult-family-services-division-orctapp-1986.