1|IPORTER SCOTT 2 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Carl L. Fessenden, SBN 161494 3 || clessenden @porterscott.com Cruz Rocha, SBN 279293 4 || crocha@porterscott.com 2180 Harvard Street, Suite 500 5 Sacramento, California 95815 TEL: 916.929.1481 6 |] 916.927.3706 7 || Attorney for Defendants 8 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, JIM COOPER, and JAMES EDDINS 9 Exempt from Filing Fees Pursuant to Government Code § 6103 10 || Mark E. Merin Paul H. Masuhara 11 |) LAW OFFICE OF MARK E. MERIN 1010 F Street, Suite 300 12 Sacramento, CA 95814 13 mark @markmerin.com paul @markmerin.com 14 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 15 ESTATE OF DAVID BAREFIELD SR., DAVID BAREFIELD II, AARON BAREFIELD, FINAS BAREFIELD, and LOIS BAREFIELD, 16 7 UNITED STATES OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 19 ESTATE OF DAVID BAREFIELD SR., CASE NO. 2:24-cv-03427-TLN-JDP 20 DAVID BAREFIELD Il, AARON BAREFIELD, FINAS BAREFIELD, and PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE 21 || LOIS BAREFIELD, ORDER RE: VIDEO 22 Plaintiffs, 23 Complaint Filed: 12/10/2024 Vv. 24 5 CITY OF SACRAMENTO, SACRAMENTO POLICE DEPARTMENT, KATHERINE 26 || LESTER, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S 27 DEPARTMENT, JIM COOPER, JAMES 28 EDDINS, and DOE 1 to 20, fPROPOSED} STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: VIDEO
1 Defendants. ___________________________________/ 2 3 4 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 5 A. PURPOSE AND LIMITATION 6 Defendants believe that the disclosure and discovery activity concerning the materials described 7 in this stipulated protective order is likely to involve production of information for which protection from 8 public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation would be warranted. 9 Plaintiffs have not been permitted to view the materials described in this stipulated protective order. The 10 parties acknowledge that this protective order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or 11 discovery activity, and that the protection it affords extends only to the limited information or items that 12 are entitled to such protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). The parties further 13 acknowledge that this stipulated protective order does not entitle any party to file information designated 14 as protected or confidential under seal, where Local Rule 141 sets forth the procedures that must be 15 followed and reflects the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the Court to 16 file material under seal. 17 B. DEFINITIONS 18 The following definitions shall apply to this Protective Order: 19 1. The “Action” shall mean and refer to the above-captioned matter and to all actions now or 20 later consolidated with the Action, and any appeal from the Action and from any other action consolidated 21 at any time under the above-captioned matter, through final judgment. 22 2. “Documents” or “Confidential Documents” shall mean the documents that Defendants 23 designate as “Confidential” and described in section C. 24 3. “Confidential” shall mean information designated “Confidential” pursuant to this 25 stipulated protective order. Information designated “Confidential” shall be information that is determined 26 in good faith by the attorneys representing the designating party to be subject to protection pursuant to 27 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). Confidential documents, material, and/or information shall be used 28 solely for purposes of litigation. Confidential information shall not be used by the non-designating party 1 for any business or other purpose, unless agreed to in writing by all parties to this action or as authorized 2 by further order of the Court. 3 4. “Defendants” shall mean COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SACRAMENTO COUNTY 4 SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, JIM COOPER, and JAMES EDDINS. 5 5. “Plaintiffs” shall mean ESTATE OF DAVID BAREFIELD SR., DAVID BAREFIELD II, 6 AARON BAREFIELD, FINAS BAREFIELD, and LOIS BAREFIELD. 7 6. “Parties” shall mean Plaintiffs and Defendants, identified above. 8 C. INFORMATION COVERED 9 Covered Information: 10 Pursuant to Local Rule 141.1(c)(1), a description of the information eligible for protection under 11 this stipulated protective order is limited to the following: 12 1. Redacted Body Worn Camera video from inside the jail depicting the matter which is the 13 subject of this litigation. 14 Particularized Need for Protection: 15 Pursuant to Local Rule141.1(c)(2), Defendants assert that there exists a specific, particularized 16 need for protection as to the information covered by this stipulated protective order. Defendants represent 17 to the Court and Plaintiffs that the materials designated to be covered by this stipulated protective order 18 are limited solely to those which would qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), 19 and does not include information designated on a blanket or indiscriminate basis. See, e.g., In Re Roman 20 Catholic Archbishop of Portland, 661 F.3d 417, 424 (9th Cir. 2011). 21 Showing of Need for a Protective Order: 22 Pursuant to Local Rule 141.1(c)(3), protection afforded by this stipulated protective order is for 23 the convenience of Defendants and the Court. Defendants seek to avoid litigation and expenditure of 24 resources concerning a potential motion for protective order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25 26(c). The entry of this stipulated protective order may prevent the parties and the Court from conducting 26 the usual document-by-document analysis necessary to obtain protection, in favor of a procedure whereby 27 presumptive protection is afforded based on Defendants’ good faith representations of the need for 28 protection. See, e.g., Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., 785 F.2d 1108, 1122 (3d Cir. 1986) As a result, 1 production may be made with this stipulated protective order in place and, if necessary, it will permit 2 discrete and narrowed challenges to documents designated for protection. 3 D. TERMS OF THE PROTECTIVE ORDER 4 Confidential Documents subject to protection may be designated as “Confidential” and produced 5 subject to this stipulated protective order: 6 1. The Confidential documents shall be used solely in connection with the above-captioned 7 civil case, and in the preparation and trial of the case. The parties do not waive any objections to the 8 admissibility of the documents or portions thereof in future proceedings in this case, including trial. 9 2. The parties will designate the Confidential documents as confidential by affixing a mark 10 labelling them “Confidential” or otherwise specifically designating in writing visual media that is 11 protected. 12 3. The Confidential documents may only be disclosed to the following persons: 13 a. Plaintiffs and Mark E. Merin and Paul H. Masuhara of the Law Office of Mark E. 14 Merin, and any partners and associates in that office; 15 b. Defendants and Carl L. Fessenden and Cruz Rocha of Porter Scott, and any partners 16 and associates in that office; 17 c. Paralegal, clerical, and secretarial personnel or support staff regularly employed by 18 counsel referred to in subparts (a) and (b) immediately above, including stenographic deposition reporters 19 or videographers retained in connection with this action; 20 d.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1|IPORTER SCOTT 2 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Carl L. Fessenden, SBN 161494 3 || clessenden @porterscott.com Cruz Rocha, SBN 279293 4 || crocha@porterscott.com 2180 Harvard Street, Suite 500 5 Sacramento, California 95815 TEL: 916.929.1481 6 |] 916.927.3706 7 || Attorney for Defendants 8 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, JIM COOPER, and JAMES EDDINS 9 Exempt from Filing Fees Pursuant to Government Code § 6103 10 || Mark E. Merin Paul H. Masuhara 11 |) LAW OFFICE OF MARK E. MERIN 1010 F Street, Suite 300 12 Sacramento, CA 95814 13 mark @markmerin.com paul @markmerin.com 14 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 15 ESTATE OF DAVID BAREFIELD SR., DAVID BAREFIELD II, AARON BAREFIELD, FINAS BAREFIELD, and LOIS BAREFIELD, 16 7 UNITED STATES OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 19 ESTATE OF DAVID BAREFIELD SR., CASE NO. 2:24-cv-03427-TLN-JDP 20 DAVID BAREFIELD Il, AARON BAREFIELD, FINAS BAREFIELD, and PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE 21 || LOIS BAREFIELD, ORDER RE: VIDEO 22 Plaintiffs, 23 Complaint Filed: 12/10/2024 Vv. 24 5 CITY OF SACRAMENTO, SACRAMENTO POLICE DEPARTMENT, KATHERINE 26 || LESTER, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S 27 DEPARTMENT, JIM COOPER, JAMES 28 EDDINS, and DOE 1 to 20, fPROPOSED} STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: VIDEO
1 Defendants. ___________________________________/ 2 3 4 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 5 A. PURPOSE AND LIMITATION 6 Defendants believe that the disclosure and discovery activity concerning the materials described 7 in this stipulated protective order is likely to involve production of information for which protection from 8 public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation would be warranted. 9 Plaintiffs have not been permitted to view the materials described in this stipulated protective order. The 10 parties acknowledge that this protective order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or 11 discovery activity, and that the protection it affords extends only to the limited information or items that 12 are entitled to such protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). The parties further 13 acknowledge that this stipulated protective order does not entitle any party to file information designated 14 as protected or confidential under seal, where Local Rule 141 sets forth the procedures that must be 15 followed and reflects the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the Court to 16 file material under seal. 17 B. DEFINITIONS 18 The following definitions shall apply to this Protective Order: 19 1. The “Action” shall mean and refer to the above-captioned matter and to all actions now or 20 later consolidated with the Action, and any appeal from the Action and from any other action consolidated 21 at any time under the above-captioned matter, through final judgment. 22 2. “Documents” or “Confidential Documents” shall mean the documents that Defendants 23 designate as “Confidential” and described in section C. 24 3. “Confidential” shall mean information designated “Confidential” pursuant to this 25 stipulated protective order. Information designated “Confidential” shall be information that is determined 26 in good faith by the attorneys representing the designating party to be subject to protection pursuant to 27 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). Confidential documents, material, and/or information shall be used 28 solely for purposes of litigation. Confidential information shall not be used by the non-designating party 1 for any business or other purpose, unless agreed to in writing by all parties to this action or as authorized 2 by further order of the Court. 3 4. “Defendants” shall mean COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SACRAMENTO COUNTY 4 SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, JIM COOPER, and JAMES EDDINS. 5 5. “Plaintiffs” shall mean ESTATE OF DAVID BAREFIELD SR., DAVID BAREFIELD II, 6 AARON BAREFIELD, FINAS BAREFIELD, and LOIS BAREFIELD. 7 6. “Parties” shall mean Plaintiffs and Defendants, identified above. 8 C. INFORMATION COVERED 9 Covered Information: 10 Pursuant to Local Rule 141.1(c)(1), a description of the information eligible for protection under 11 this stipulated protective order is limited to the following: 12 1. Redacted Body Worn Camera video from inside the jail depicting the matter which is the 13 subject of this litigation. 14 Particularized Need for Protection: 15 Pursuant to Local Rule141.1(c)(2), Defendants assert that there exists a specific, particularized 16 need for protection as to the information covered by this stipulated protective order. Defendants represent 17 to the Court and Plaintiffs that the materials designated to be covered by this stipulated protective order 18 are limited solely to those which would qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), 19 and does not include information designated on a blanket or indiscriminate basis. See, e.g., In Re Roman 20 Catholic Archbishop of Portland, 661 F.3d 417, 424 (9th Cir. 2011). 21 Showing of Need for a Protective Order: 22 Pursuant to Local Rule 141.1(c)(3), protection afforded by this stipulated protective order is for 23 the convenience of Defendants and the Court. Defendants seek to avoid litigation and expenditure of 24 resources concerning a potential motion for protective order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25 26(c). The entry of this stipulated protective order may prevent the parties and the Court from conducting 26 the usual document-by-document analysis necessary to obtain protection, in favor of a procedure whereby 27 presumptive protection is afforded based on Defendants’ good faith representations of the need for 28 protection. See, e.g., Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., 785 F.2d 1108, 1122 (3d Cir. 1986) As a result, 1 production may be made with this stipulated protective order in place and, if necessary, it will permit 2 discrete and narrowed challenges to documents designated for protection. 3 D. TERMS OF THE PROTECTIVE ORDER 4 Confidential Documents subject to protection may be designated as “Confidential” and produced 5 subject to this stipulated protective order: 6 1. The Confidential documents shall be used solely in connection with the above-captioned 7 civil case, and in the preparation and trial of the case. The parties do not waive any objections to the 8 admissibility of the documents or portions thereof in future proceedings in this case, including trial. 9 2. The parties will designate the Confidential documents as confidential by affixing a mark 10 labelling them “Confidential” or otherwise specifically designating in writing visual media that is 11 protected. 12 3. The Confidential documents may only be disclosed to the following persons: 13 a. Plaintiffs and Mark E. Merin and Paul H. Masuhara of the Law Office of Mark E. 14 Merin, and any partners and associates in that office; 15 b. Defendants and Carl L. Fessenden and Cruz Rocha of Porter Scott, and any partners 16 and associates in that office; 17 c. Paralegal, clerical, and secretarial personnel or support staff regularly employed by 18 counsel referred to in subparts (a) and (b) immediately above, including stenographic deposition reporters 19 or videographers retained in connection with this action; 20 d. Court personnel, including stenographic reporters or videographers engaged in 21 proceedings as are necessarily incidental to the preparation for the trial in the civil action; 22 e. Any expert, consultant, or investigator retained in connection with this action; 23 however, such persons must be advised of and abide by this protective order; 24 f. The finder of facts at the time of trial, subject to the court’s rulings on in limine 25 motions and objections of counsel; and 26 g. Witnesses during their depositions in this action. If confidential documents are used 27 in the deposition, the documents must be identified as “Confidential” and the portion of the deposition in 28 which the documents are described should also be considered confidential. 1 4. Information covered by this stipulated protective order does not automatically entitle the 2 parties to file such information or documents with the Court under seal. Any request to seal documents is 3 governed by Local Rule 141. If the Confidential documents are filed with any motion or other pleading, a 4 party may seek permission from the Court to file the Confidential Documents under seal according to 5 Local Rule 141. If permission is granted, the Confidential documents will be filed and served in 6 accordance with Local Rule 141. 7 5. The designation of the Confidential documents as “Confidential” and the subsequent 8 production thereof is without prejudice to the right of any party to oppose the admissibility of the 9 Confidential documents or information contained therein. 10 6. Any party or non-party may challenge a Confidential designation at any time. A party or 11 non-party does not waive its right to challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a 12 challenge promptly after the original designation is disclosed. The challenging party shall initiate the 13 dispute resolution process by providing written notice of each designation it is challenging and describing 14 the basis for each challenge. The parties shall attempt to resolve each challenge in good faith and must 15 begin the process by conferring directly (in person or voice-to-voice dialogue; other forms of 16 communication are not sufficient) within seven (7) days of the date of service of notice. In conferring, the 17 challenging party must explain the basis for its belief that the confidentiality designation was not proper 18 and must give the designating party an opportunity to review the designated material, to reconsider the 19 circumstances, and, if no change in designation is offered, to explain the basis for the chosen designation. 20 A challenging party may proceed to the next stage of the challenge process only if it has engaged in this 21 meet and confer process first or establishes that the designating party is unwilling to participate in the 22 meet and confer process in a timely manner. If the parties cannot resolve a challenge without Court 23 intervention, the designating party shall file and serve a motion for protective order/to retain 24 confidentiality pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) and Local Rule 251 within twenty-one (21) 25 days of the initial notice of challenge or within seven (7) days of the parties agreeing that the meet and 26 confer process will not resolve their dispute, whichever is earlier. Failure by the designating party to make 27 such a motion within twenty-one (21) days (or seven (7) days, if applicable) shall automatically waive the 28 “Confidential” designation for each challenged designation. In addition, the challenging party may file a 1 motion challenging a confidentiality designation at any time if there is good cause for doing so. The burden 2 of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the designating party, consistent with Federal 3 Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). Unless the designating party has waived the confidentiality designation by 4 failing to file a motion for protective order/to retain confidentiality as described above, all parties shall 5 continue to afford the material in question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the 6 designating party’s designation until the Court rules on the challenge. 7 7. Should the Confidential documents or any information contained therein be disclosed, 8 through inadvertence or otherwise, to any person not authorized to receive it under this stipulated 9 protective order, the disclosing person(s) shall promptly (a) inform counsel for the Defendants of the 10 recipient(s) and the circumstances of the unauthorized disclosure to the relevant producing person(s) and 11 (b) use best efforts to bind the recipient(s) to the terms of this stipulated protective order. 12 8. The Confidential documents shall not lose its confidential status because it was 13 inadvertently or unintentionally disclosed to a person not authorized to receive it under this stipulated 14 protective order. 15 9. The protections conferred by this stipulated protective order cover the information defined 16 above, as well as any information copied from the materials. However, the protections conferred by this 17 stipulated protective order do not cover: (A) any information that is in the public domain at the time of 18 disclosure or which subsequently becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure, including 19 becoming part of the public record through trial or otherwise; and (B) any information known prior to the 20 disclosure or obtained after the disclosure from a source who obtained the information lawfully and under 21 no obligation of confidentiality. 22 10. Within 90 days after this litigation concludes by settlement, final judgment, or final order, 23 including all appeals, all documents designated as containing Confidential Information, including copies 24 as defined above, must be returned to the party who previously produced the document unless: (1) the 25 document has been offered into evidence or filed without restriction as to disclosure; (2) the document is 26 destroyed to the extent practicable in lieu of return; or (3) as to documents bearing the notations, 27 summations, or other mental impressions of the receiving party, that party elects to destroy the documents 28 and certifies to the producing party that it has done so. All confidential documents or information that is 1 subject to this protective order shall be returned or destroyed upon the conclusion of this litigation, either 2 through the settlement of the case, the dismissal of the case or the entry of a Final Order (i.e., an Order 3 not subject to further appeal). Nothing in this section requires a party, its counsel, or consultants to delete 4 discovery material which may reside on one or more backup tapes or other media maintained for purposes 5 of disaster recovery, business continuity, or other reasons, except that the parties agree that all such 6 Confidential Information will continue to be confidential under this Order. 7 11. After the conclusion of this litigation, the Confidential documents will remain confidential. 8 “Conclusion” of this litigation means a termination of the case following a trial, settlement, or dismissal 9 of the action with prejudice for any other reason. 10 12. This stipulated protective order shall remain in full force and effect and shall continue to 11 be binding on all parties and affected persons until this litigation terminates, subject to any subsequent 12 modifications of this stipulated protective order for good cause shown by this Court or any Court having 13 jurisdiction over an appeal of this action. Upon termination of this litigation, the parties agree the stipulated 14 protective order shall continue in force as a private agreement between the parties. 15 13. The parties may request additional records to be subject to this stipulated protective order. 16 If a party believes a document to be produced should be subject to this stipulated protective order, the 17 parties must meet and confer. If there is agreement, the parties shall submit an amendment to this stipulated 18 protective order to identify the additional documents. If the parties cannot agree, the party seeking 19 protection shall file a motion for protective order pursuant to the terms of Local Rule 251. 20 14. During the pendency of this lawsuit, the Court may (a) make such amendments, 21 modifications, and/or additions to this stipulated protective order as deemed appropriate upon good cause 22 shown; and (b) adjudicate any dispute arising under it. 23 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 Dated: December 20, 2024 PORTER SCOTT A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION By /s/Carl L. Fessenden 2 Carl L. Fessenden Cruz Rocha 3 Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF 4 SACRAMENTO, SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, 5 JIM COOPER, and JAMES EDDINS 6 7 || Dated: December 20, 2024 LAW OFFICE OF MARK E. MERIN 8 9 By /s/Mark E. Merin (Authorized on 12/19/24) Mark E. Merin 10 Paul H. Masuhara Attorneys for Plaintiffs ESTATE OF DAVID BAREFIELD SR.., 12 DAVID BAREFIELD H, AARON BAREFIELD, FINAS BAREFIELD, and 13 LOIS BAREFIELD, 14 15 16 fPROPOSED} ORDER 17 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: _ December 20, 2024 Q_-——— JEREMY D. PETERSON 2 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28 fPROPOSED} STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: VIDEO
1 EXHIBIT A 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND 3 I, _____________________________ [print or type full name], of _________________ [print or 4 type full address], declare under penalty of perjury that I have read in its entirety and understand the 5 Stipulated Protective Order that was issued by the United States District Court, Eastern District of 6 California, on [date] in the case of Estate of David Barefield v. City of Sacramento, et al., Case No. 2:24- 7 cv-03427-TLN-JDP. I agree to comply with and to be bound by all the terms of this Stipulated Protective 8 Order and I understand and acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and 9 punishment in the nature of contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any 10 information or item that is subject to this Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity except in 11 strict compliance with the provisions of this Order. 12 I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court, Eastern District of 13 California, for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order, even if such 14 enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this action. 15 I hereby appoint __________________________ [print or type full name] of 16 _______________________________________ [print or type full address and telephone number] as my 17 California agent for service of process in connection with this action or any proceedings related to 18 enforcement of this Stipulated Protective Order. 19 20 Date: ______________________________________ 21 City and State where sworn and signed: _________________________________ 22 23 Printed name: _______________________________ 24 25 Signature: __________________________________ 26