Estate of Daniel Hernandez v. City of Los Angeles
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 8 2024 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ESTATE OF DANIEL HERNANDEZ, by No. 21-55994 and through successors in interest, Manuel Hernandez, Maria Hernandez and M.L.H.; D.C. Nos. 2:20-cv-04477-SB-KS MANUEL HERNANDEZ, individually; 2:20-cv-05154-DMG-KS MARIA HERNANDEZ, individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants, ORDER and M.L.H., a minor, by and through her guardian ad litem Claudia Sugey Chavez, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES; LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT; TONI MCBRIDE, Defendants-Appellees.
M.L.H., a minor, by and through her No. 21-55995 guardian ad litem Claudia Sugey Chavez, D.C. Nos. 2:20-cv-04477-SB-KS Plaintiff-Appellant, 2:20-cv-05154-DMG-KS and ESTATE OF DANIEL HERNANDEZ, by and through successors in interest, Manuel Hernandez, Maria Hernandez and M.L.H.; MANUEL HERNANDEZ, individually; MARIA HERNANDEZ, individually, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES; LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT; TONI MCBRIDE,
Defendants-Appellees.
MURGUIA, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that
this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)
and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.
Judge Ikuta did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
106 F.4th 940 (Estate of Daniel Hernandez v. City of Los Angeles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.