Estate of Dalenko v. File

Fourth Circuit

Estate of Dalenko v. File

185 F. App'x 294

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 23, 2006·No. No. 05-2223·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Carol Bennett and the Estate of Louis Dalenko appeal the district court’s orders and judgments dismissing the complaints and sanctioning Bennett. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Dalenko v. File, Nos. CA-03-550-5-H; CA-04-301-5-H; CA-04-438-5-H; CA-04-811-5-H (E.D.N.C. Feb. 5, 2004; Mar. 2, 2004; Dec. 21, 2004; Mar. 16, 2005; Aug. 26, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Carol Bennett and the Estate of Louis Dalenko appeal the district court’s orders and judgments dismissing the complaints and sanctioning Bennett. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Dalenko v. File, Nos. CA-03-550-5-H; CA-04-301-5-H; CA-04-438-5-H; CA-04-811-5-H (E.D.N.C. Feb. 5, 2004; Mar. 2, 2004; Dec. 21, 2004; Mar. 16, 2005; Aug. 26, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Estate of Dalenko v. File, 185 F. App'x 294 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

185 F. App'x 294 (Estate of Dalenko v. File) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.