Estate of Cunningham v. Commissioner

1955 T.C. Memo. 296, 14 T.C.M. 1144, 1955 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 41
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedOctober 31, 1955
DocketDocket No. 54094.
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1955 T.C. Memo. 296 (Estate of Cunningham v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Estate of Cunningham v. Commissioner, 1955 T.C. Memo. 296, 14 T.C.M. 1144, 1955 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 41 (tax 1955).

Opinion

Estate of Thomas F. Cunningham, Deceased, Equitable Security Trust Company, Executor v. Commissioner.
Estate of Cunningham v. Commissioner
Docket No. 54094.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1955-296; 1955 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 41; 14 T.C.M. (CCH) 1144; T.C.M. (RIA) 55296;
October 31, 1955
*41 John C. Reid, Esq., for the petitioner. Max J. Hamburger, Esq., for the respondent.

JOHNSON

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

JOHNSON, Judge: The Commissioner determined a deficiency in income tax of Thomas F. Cunningham, now deceased, for the year 1951 in the amount of $28,326.61.

The sole issue is whether $50,000 received by decedent, Thomas F. Cunningham, during the year 1950 from Russell D. Ketcham and Paulina D. Ketcham in connection with the sale by decedent of an interest in his business constituted ordinary income, as determined by the Commissioner, or capital gains, as claimed by petitioner.

Findings of Fact

The stipulation of facts, with the exhibits attached thereto, is made a part hereof.

Thomas F. Cunningham, hereinafter referred to as decedent, at and prior to his death on August 6, 1952, resided in Wilmington, Delaware, and he filed his individual income tax return and amended return for the taxable year 1951 with the collector of internal revenue for the district of Delaware.

On May 5, 1949, the decedent entered into written agreements with Crucible Steel Company of America, hereinafter called Crucible, and also with Trent Tube Company, *42 hereinafter called Trent, manufacturers of steel products, under which he was to act as the exclusive sales agent of each of said companies for their products on all sales to the du Pont Company of Wilmington, Delaware, and its affiliated companies, as well as fabricators doing work for the du Pont organization. Under these sales agency contracts the decedent was to receive a commission of 5 per cent of the net price to the purchasers. Commissions were payable only after the goods sold had been shipped and payment received by the steel companies from the purchasers. Said agreements were to continue one year from date "and thereafter until terminated by either party on thirty days written notice." Both agreements were "personal to Cunningham" and were not assignable.

The decedent conducted his sales agency business as a sole proprietorship until November 1, 1951, by which time the business was well established. On November 1, 1951, the decedent entered into a written partnership agreement with Russell D. Ketcham and his wife, Paulina D. Ketcham, under which a partnership called Cunningham & Company was created for the purpose of carrying on the sales agency business previously conducted*43 by the decedent. Under the partnership agreement the decedent therein assigned all interest in his sales agency contracts to the partnership and agreed to cause any new agency contracts to be issued to the partnership. Partnership profits were to be distributed 50 per cent to decedent, 25 per cent to Russell D. Ketcham and 25 per cent to Paulina D. Ketcham, and losses, if any, were to be borne accordingly.

Among other provisions contained in the six and a half page partnership agreement were these:

Recital that decedent had been engaged in the business of selling steel and steel products on a commission basis "and now because of the condition of his health" wishes to be relieved of many of the activities in connection with such business and desires to bring into such business as an equal partner Russell D. Ketcham. Decedent was to be managing partner and generally direct the activities and conduct of the partnership business, but only to devote thereto such portion of his time as the condition of his health would permit. Ketcham was to devote his entire time to the business. Mrs. Ketcham was to devote only such time to the partnership as "in her sole discretion she may determine*44 advisable through the channels of her social and business contacts." Martha G. Clark, then and for some time prior thereto an employee as secretary of decedent, was to be continued as an employee of the partnership so long as decedent "shall deem her employment for the best interest of the partnership."

On November 1, 1951, decedent was suffering from a heart ailment and had prior thereto sustained two heart attacks.

In November, 1951, upon the execution of the partnership agreement by decedent and the transfer by him of his business to the partnership, Russell D. Ketcham and Paulina D. Ketcham paid decedent therefor $50,000 which they obtained through the financial assistance of J. Simpson Dean, Mrs. Ketcham's father. Dean was interested in establishing Ketcham in business and he initiated and carried on much of the negotiations with decedent which began in the summer of 1951 for the purchase by the Ketchams of an interest in decedent's business.

In the negotiations between decedent and Dean and Russell Ketcham, the decedent represented that at that time he had orders on his books, commissions due him somewhere in the neighborhood of $200,000.

On the basis of an analysis prepared*45 by Minor E. Munsey, Jr., C.P.A., of orders which the decedent had on his books as of November 1, 1951, from du Pont Company and its subsidiaries, said orders, if filled, would have produced commissions payable to the decedent under his contracts with Crucible and Trent as follows:

Trent$51,302.30
Crucible58,650.61
Total$109,952.91

From and after November 1, 1951, the date the partnership Cunningham & Company was created, the business previously conducted by decedent as a sole proprietorship was conducted by the partnership. New sales agency contracts were issued by Crucible Steel and Trent Tube in the partnership name.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pursglove v. Commissioner
20 T.C. 68 (U.S. Tax Court, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1955 T.C. Memo. 296, 14 T.C.M. 1144, 1955 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 41, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-cunningham-v-commissioner-tax-1955.