Estate of Crozier

California Supreme Court

Estate of Crozier

4 P. 412, 2 Cal. Unrep. 345

California Supreme Court·Decided July 25, 1884·No. No. 9119·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the COURT.

The demurrer to the petition for revocation of the probate of the will was properly overruled. The petitioner alleges that one of the grounds on which she asks for such revocation is “that at the time of signing said supposed will by him the said James Crozier was not of sound and disposing mind, but, on the contrary, said deceased was at said time of unsound mind.” If this is not an averment that he was of unsound mind, we do not know what would be.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the COURT.

The demurrer to the petition for revocation of the probate of the will was properly overruled. The petitioner alleges that one of the grounds on which she asks for such revocation is “that at the time of signing said supposed will by him the said James Crozier was not of sound and disposing mind, but, on the contrary, said deceased was at said time of unsound mind.” If this is not an averment that he was of unsound mind, we do not know what would be.

Decree affirmed.

Estate of Crozier, 4 P. 412, 2 Cal. Unrep. 345 (Cal. 1884).

Pincite

4 P. 412 (Estate of Crozier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related