Estate of Covington v. Young
Opinion
This cause began as a foreclosure action brought by Leondres Pryon Young and Judith Eloise Young (the Youngs) against the appellees, Wilfred F. Still and Jacqueline H. Still (the Stills). While the suit was pending the Stills filed a third-party complaint for indemnification against appellant, The Estate of James F. Covington, Jr., and Flagship Bank. The trial court granted summary judgment for the Stills on the issue of liability on the indemnity claim prior to any determination that the Stills were liable in the main foreclosure proceeding. The entry of judgment against Covington on the claim of indemnity, prior to any finding of liability in favor of the plaintiff on the main claim, constitutes premature action on the part of the trial court. See Jerome Nagelbush, Inc. v. Frank J. Rooney, Inc., 342 So.2d 121 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); see also Mitsubishi International Corp. v. Zayre Corp., 479 So.2d 877 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Maple Chair Company v. W.S. Badcock Corp., 385 So. 2d 1036 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).
Accordingly, the order entered below is reversed without prejudice and subject to further proceedings pending the out[361]*361come of the main claim.1
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
521 So. 2d 360 (Estate of Covington v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.