Estate of Clarence H. Loeb, Deceased, Bessie Robinson Loeb, Isidore Robinson and Harry Robinson, Executors v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

261 F.2d 232, 3 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1710, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 5500
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedNovember 28, 1958
Docket12, Docket 25015
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 261 F.2d 232 (Estate of Clarence H. Loeb, Deceased, Bessie Robinson Loeb, Isidore Robinson and Harry Robinson, Executors v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Estate of Clarence H. Loeb, Deceased, Bessie Robinson Loeb, Isidore Robinson and Harry Robinson, Executors v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 261 F.2d 232, 3 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1710, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 5500 (2d Cir. 1958).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The decedent died on August 25, 1951. His wife Bessie and three sons survived him. In April 1941 Bessie took out three insurance policies on the life of her husband. The policies named her as beneficiary and the proceeds thereof were paid to her after her husband’s death. He never had any control of the policies or any incidents of ownership. All premiums on the policies were paid by the wife by checks drawn on her personal checking account. Most of the funds deposited in her checking account were gifts from her husband but she testified she could have used the gifts for what *233 ever purpose she pleased. The Tax Court held (1) that the husband indirectly paid the premiums and therefore the proceeds of the policies were includi-ble in his estate under § 811(g)(2)(A) of the 1939 Code as amended, 26 U.S. C.A. § 811(g)(2)(A); and (2) that said section is not unconstitutional in its application to this case. The opinion by Judge Tietjens is reported in 29 T.C. 22 and was reviewed by the Tax Court.

All the points advanced by the petitioners on their appeal were presented below and have been carefully considered and competently discussed in the opinion of the Tax Court. We have nothing to add to the discussion.

Decision affirmed on opinion below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Estate of Chapin v. Commissioner
1970 T.C. Memo. 7 (U.S. Tax Court, 1970)
Carlton v. Commissioner
34 T.C. 988 (U.S. Tax Court, 1960)
Manufacturers National Bank of Detroit v. United States
175 F. Supp. 291 (E.D. Michigan, 1959)
Schwarz v. United States
170 F. Supp. 2 (E.D. Louisiana, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
261 F.2d 232, 3 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1710, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 5500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-clarence-h-loeb-deceased-bessie-robinson-loeb-isidore-ca2-1958.