Estate of Cheda

California Supreme Court

Estate of Cheda

202 P. 133, 187 Cal. 322, 1921 Cal. LEXIS 362

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 8, 1921

DocketS. F. No. 9998.

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 202 P. 133 (Estate of Cheda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Estate of Cheda, 202 P. 133, 187 Cal. 322, 1921 Cal. LEXIS 362 (Cal. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

Motion to dismiss appeal from order on ground that the same is not an appealable order.

The order was one made by the superior court under section 1597 et seq. of the Code of Civil Procedure, directing the executors to transfer and deliver to a third party certain assets of the estate, being certain shares of bank stock. The application for the order and the order were based on a contract for the sale thereof alleged to have been made by the deceased.

[1] The claim that the order is nonappealable is based on the fact that such an order is not specified as an appeal-able order in the statute specifying the probate judgments and orders from which an appeal may be taken. (Code Civ. *323 Proc., subd. 3, sec. 963.) If the order here were exclusively a probate order there would be much force in the claim. [2] We are of opinion, however, that the proceeding authorized by section 1597 et seq. is in substance more than, this, being practically a proceeding in equity terminating in a final judgment, having the full force and effect of a final judgment in an action for specific performance of a contract. As such we deem the order made therein a final judgment, appealable under subdivision 1 of section 963 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

It was for this reason that the motion to dismiss the appeal was denied from the bench.

Angellotti, C. J., Wilbur, J., Shaw, J., Sloane, J;, Shurtleff, J., Lawlor, J., and Lennon, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

Motion to dismiss appeal from order on ground that the same is not an appealable order.

The order was one made by the superior court under section 1597 et seq. of the Code of Civil Procedure, directing the executors to transfer and deliver to a third party certain assets of the estate, being certain shares of bank stock. The application for the order and the order were based on a contract for the sale thereof alleged to have been made by the deceased.

[1] The claim that the order is nonappealable is based on the fact that such an order is not specified as an appeal-able order in the statute specifying the probate judgments and orders from which an appeal may be taken. (Code Civ. *323 Proc., subd. 3, sec. 963.) If the order here were exclusively a probate order there would be much force in the claim. [2] We are of opinion, however, that the proceeding authorized by section 1597 et seq. is in substance more than, this, being practically a proceeding in equity terminating in a final judgment, having the full force and effect of a final judgment in an action for specific performance of a contract. As such we deem the order made therein a final judgment, appealable under subdivision 1 of section 963 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

It was for this reason that the motion to dismiss the appeal was denied from the bench.

Angellotti, C. J., Wilbur, J., Shaw, J., Sloane, J;, Shurtleff, J., Lawlor, J., and Lennon, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 P. 133, 187 Cal. 322, 1921 Cal. LEXIS 362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-cheda-cal-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack