Estate of Cascardo

861 A.2d 884, 580 Pa. 380, 2004 Pa. LEXIS 2706
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 10, 2004
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 861 A.2d 884 (Estate of Cascardo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Estate of Cascardo, 861 A.2d 884, 580 Pa. 380, 2004 Pa. LEXIS 2706 (Pa. 2004).

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 10th day of November, 2004, the Petition for Alowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, the order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and this case REMANDED. As petitioners’ challenge was confined to the application of this statute, and not its facial constitutionality, the Attorney General did not need to be notified. See Kepple v. Fairman Drilling Co., 532 Pa. 304, 615 A.2d 1298 (1992). This case is therefore remanded for the [885]*885Superior Court to review the merits of this issue. Jurisdiction relinquished.

Justice SAYLOR files a Dissenting Statement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

W. Watt v. WCAB (Boyd Brothers Transportation)
123 A.3d 1155 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
861 A.2d 884, 580 Pa. 380, 2004 Pa. LEXIS 2706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-cascardo-pa-2004.