Estate of Cascardo
This text of 861 A.2d 884 (Estate of Cascardo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ORDER
AND NOW, this 10th day of November, 2004, the Petition for Alowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, the order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and this case REMANDED. As petitioners’ challenge was confined to the application of this statute, and not its facial constitutionality, the Attorney General did not need to be notified. See Kepple v. Fairman Drilling Co., 532 Pa. 304, 615 A.2d 1298 (1992). This case is therefore remanded for the [885]*885Superior Court to review the merits of this issue. Jurisdiction relinquished.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
861 A.2d 884, 580 Pa. 380, 2004 Pa. LEXIS 2706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-cascardo-pa-2004.