Estate of Carolyn Mickens v. Newman
This text of Estate of Carolyn Mickens v. Newman (Estate of Carolyn Mickens v. Newman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
) ESTATE OF CAROLYN MICKENS, et ) al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) No. 18-cv-0928 (KBJ) ) US BANK, NATIONAL ) ASSOCIATION, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On May 22, 2018, defendant BWW Law Group, LLC filed a motion to dismiss
Plaintiffs’ complaint. (ECF No. 5.) This Court’s Local Civil Rules provide that
“[w]ithin 14 days of the date of service or at such other time as the court may direct, an
opposing party shall serve and file a memorandum of points and authorities in
opposition to [a] motion [or] the Court may treat the motion as conceded.” LCvR 7(b).
To date, Plaintiffs have neither filed an opposition to the motion nor requested more
time to do so. Therefore, the Court will GRANT the motion to dismiss as conceded and
will DISMISS without prejudice Plaintiffs’ claims against BWW Law Group.
A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
DATE: June 18, 2018 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Estate of Carolyn Mickens v. Newman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-carolyn-mickens-v-newman-dcd-2018.