Estate of Carmen Mendez v. City of Ceres

District Court, E.D. California·Decided September 26, 2019·No. 1:18-cv-01677·Unknown

Opinion

1 4 ESTATE OF CARMEN MENDEZ, JORGE 5 MENDEZ, SR., JORGE MENDEZ, JR., Case No. 1:18-cv-01677-LJO-BAM KYLAND RILEY, ROSARIO SANCHEZ, 6 BERTHA MENDEZ, and DOMINGO STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER MENDEZ, 7 Plaintiffs, 8 v. 9 CITY OF CERES, CERES POLICE BAYS, and DOE 26 to 50, 11 Defendants. 12

13 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 14 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of 15 confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure 16 and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, 17 pursuant to Eastern District Local Rule 141.1(c), the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court 18 to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The information for which protection is sought 19 includes portions of personnel files, internal affairs files and internal investigation files of the City of 20 Ceres and its Police Department. 21 A Protective Order is sought so the documents and information can be used by the parties in 22 preparation for trial and shared with persons who would not be subject to a private agreement 23 between the parties. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on 24 all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and 25 use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under 26 the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, 27 that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; 1 Local Rule 141 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied 2 when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 3 2. DEFINITIONS 4 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of 5 information or items under this Order. 6 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is 7 generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of 8 Civil Procedure 26(c). 9 2.3 Counsel: Attorneys (and their support staff) who are retained to represent or advise a 10 party to this action and have appeared in this action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a 11 law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party. 12 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items it 13 produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” The information or 14 items shall be identified as follows: “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL 15 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER, Mendez v. City of Ceres USDC Case no. 1:18-cv-01677- 16 LJO-BAM.” 17 2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium 18 or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, 19 transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to 20 discovery in this matter. 21 2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to 22 the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a 23 consultant in this action. 24 2.7 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal 25 entity not named as a Party to this action. 26 2.8 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, 27 consultants, retained experts, and Counsel (and their support staff). 1 Material in this action. 2 2.10 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services 3 (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, 4 storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 5 2.11 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as 6 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 7 2.12 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a 8 Producing Party. 9 3. SCOPE 10 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material (as 11 defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all 12 copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, 13 conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. 14 However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following 15 information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving 16 Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of 17 publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the public record 18 through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to the 19 disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained the 20 information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party. Any use of 21 Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order. 22 4. DURATION 23 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this 24 Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order 25 otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and 26 defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion 27 and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, including the 1 5. PROTECTED MATERIAL 2 5.1 Protected Material. 3 Defendants will produce confidential material subject to this Protective Order on the 4 following conditions: 5 (a) Documents Subject to Disclosure Limited to This Action. The documents requested by 6 Plaintiffs through discovery come from the personnel files, internal investigations files and internal 7 affairs files of the City of Ceres and its Police Department portions of which may be protected by the 8 California Peace Officers Bill of Rights, the federal common law qualified privilege known as the 9 Official Information Privilege, the federal deliberative-executive process privilege, federal attorney- 10 client privilege and/or attorney work product protection in the personnel files of peace officers, 11 California Evidence Code §1040, et seq., California Penal Code §§832.7 and 832.8, the Right to 12 Privacy of the defendant officers and third-party non-defendant City of Ceres employees, victims, 13 and minors as guaranteed by the United States Constitution and the California Constitution (Cal. 14 Const., Art. 1, §1). 15 The confidential documents and the information contained therein shall be used solely in 16 connection with this litigation, including appeals, and not for any other purpose, including other 17 litigation. 18 (b) Redaction of Confidential Information. Considering the privacy concerns which may be 19 applicable to portions of materials in the personnel files, internal affairs files and internal 20 investigation files, Defendants shall redact the identities of minors or domestic violence victims and 21 personal identifying information (social security numbers, month and day of birth, driver’s license 22 numbers, and home addresses). Each Party or Non-Party that designates information or items for 23 protection under this Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that 24 qualifies under the appropriate standards.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Estate of Carmen Mendez v. City of Ceres, (E.D. Cal. 2019).

Estate of Carmen Mendez v. City of Ceres (Estate of Carmen Mendez v. City of Ceres) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)