Estate of Bruce Barton v. Adt Security Services Pension

837 F.3d 1014, 2016 WL 5030341
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 20, 2016·No. 13-56379·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

ORDER

Judges Kozinski and Owens have voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc. Judge Ikuta has voted to grant the petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc.

The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active [1015] judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35.

The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Estate of Bruce Barton v. Adt Security Services Pension, 837 F.3d 1014, 2016 WL 5030341 (9th Cir. 2016).

837 F.3d 1014 (Estate of Bruce Barton v. Adt Security Services Pension) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Omega Hosp., LLC v. United Healthcare Servs., Inc.
389 F. Supp. 3d 412 (M.D. Louisiana, 2019)