Estate of Bingham v. Nationwide Life Insurance

646 P.2d 1048, 231 Kan. 389, 1982 Kan. LEXIS 278
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedJune 11, 1982
Docket52,480
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 646 P.2d 1048 (Estate of Bingham v. Nationwide Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Estate of Bingham v. Nationwide Life Insurance, 646 P.2d 1048, 231 Kan. 389, 1982 Kan. LEXIS 278 (kan 1982).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an action brought by certain named beneficiaries to recover benefits under a group life and health insurance policy. After extensive discovery, the district court sustained the motion of the plaintiffs for summary judgment and awarded plaintiffs the full amount of the benefits under the policy plus attorney fees. The defendant, Nationwide Life Insurance Company, appealed to the Court of Appeals. That court affirmed in a unanimous opinion by Frederick Woleslagel, district judge retired, who was assigned to the Court of Appeals panel. The comprehensive and well-written opinion by Judge Woleslagel may be found in Estate of Bingham v. Nationwide Life Ins. Co., 7 Kan. App. 2d 72, 638 P.2d 352 (1981). The Supreme Court granted Nationwide’s petition for review.

The opinion of the Court of Appeals sets forth the undisputed facts, the issues presented in the case, and the controlling Kansas law. After consideration of the entire record and the briefs of counsel, we have concluded that the case was correctly determined by the Court of Appeals and that the judgment of the Court of Appeals affirming the judgment of the district court should be affirmed by this court. We adopt the opinion of the Court of Appeals except for that portion of that opinion remanding the *390 case to the district court to determine and allow an additional attorney fee for the plaintiffs on the appeal. The allowance of an attorney fee on appeal is a matter for determination by the appellate court on motion of a party to the appeal.

The judgment of the district court and the judgment of the Court of Appeals affirming the district court are affirmed as modified.

Fromme, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Evergreen Recycle, L.L.C. v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Co.
350 P.3d 1091 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 2015)
Midwest Asphalt Coating, Inc. v. Chelsea Plaza Homes, Inc.
243 P.3d 1106 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 2010)
National Union Fire Insurance v. Federal Deposit Insurance
957 P.2d 357 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1998)
Container Supply Co. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance
715 F. Supp. 326 (D. Kansas, 1989)
Friedman v. Alliance Insurance
729 P.2d 1160 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1986)
Rosson v. Cutshall
719 P.2d 23 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 1986)
Farmco, Inc. v. Explosive Specialists, Inc.
684 P.2d 436 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 1984)
State v. Yost
654 P.2d 458 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
646 P.2d 1048, 231 Kan. 389, 1982 Kan. LEXIS 278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-bingham-v-nationwide-life-insurance-kan-1982.