Estate of Bartelson

2011 ND 219
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 2011
Docket20110114
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 2011 ND 219 (Estate of Bartelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Estate of Bartelson, 2011 ND 219 (N.D. 2011).

Opinion

Filed 11/15/11 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2011 ND 211

Edward J. Tarnavsky, Plaintiff and Appellant

v.

First National Bank and Trust Co., Defendant and Appellee

No. 20110151

Appeal from the District Court of Williams County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable Gary H. Lee, Judge.

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.

Per Curiam.

Edward J. Tarnavsky (on brief), 12951 8th Street Northwest, Grassy Butte, N.D. 58634; self-represented.

Richard P. Olson (on brief), P.O. Box 1180, Minot, N.D. 58702-1180 and Mark L. Stenehjem (on brief), P.O. Box 1366, Williston, N.D. 58802-1366.

Tarnavsky v. First National Bank and Trust Co.

[¶1] Edward J. Tarnavsky appeals from a judgment granting First National Bank and Trust Company’s motion for summary judgment dismissing his claims of misconduct against the Bank, awarding the Bank $16,746.75 for attorney fees and costs, and denying Tarnavsky’s N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for relief from the judgment.  On appeal, Tarnavsky raises two issues he claims require reversal of the judgment.  Tarnavsky argues the district court “ha[s] an appearance of impropriety” because it is “possib[le]” that the Bank’s attorney “was Judge Lee’s law examiner.”  Tarnavsky also argues the Bank’s attorney “ha[s] a conflict of interest” because Tarnavsky is a “derivative client” of the Bank’s attorney.  Assuming for purposes of argument that these issues were adequately raised in the district court, we conclude Tarnavsky’s appeal is frivolous and we summarily affirm the judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1).  We award double costs on appeal to the Bank under N.D.R.App.P. 38.  We remand to the district court to determine and award to the Bank reasonable attorney fees for the appeal and to consider the Bank’s request for injunctive relief prohibiting Tarnavsky from filing further pleadings in state court without prior judicial approval.

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Mary Muehlen Maring

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Estate of Froemke
2023 ND 154 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2023)
In Re Estate of Bartelson
2019 ND 107 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2019)
Estate of Brandt
2019 ND 87 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2019)
Estate of Vaage v. State
2016 ND 32 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2016)
Estate of Bartelson
2015 ND 147 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2015)
Tarnavsky v. First National Bank and Trust Co.
2011 ND 211 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2011 ND 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-bartelson-nd-2011.