Estate of Barber
21 A. 986, 142 Pa. 476, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 764
Pennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County·Decided May 25, 1891·No. No. 226·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
An examination of the record in this case has failed to convince us that there is any error therein that requires a reversal or modification of the decree. Neither of the thirty-three specifications of error requires special notice. The controlling questions involved in them are sufficiently presented and properly disposed of in the opinion of the court below.
Decree affirmed, and appeal dismissed at the costs of appellants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Estate of Barber, 21 A. 986, 142 Pa. 476, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 764 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1891).
21 A. 986 (Estate of Barber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Bennett
179 A.2d 812 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1962)
State v. McKrackern
41 A.2d 817 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1945)
Middlecoff v. Superior Court of San Joaquin Cty.
84 P. 764 (California Supreme Court, 1906)