Estate of Bain v. Bibolini
737 So. 2d 1238, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10420, 1999 WL 565096
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 4, 1999·No. No. 98-2589·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Because funds held in an escrow account maintained by the seller’s attorney for partial payment of a real estate commission were equitably owned by the broker to whom the commission was due,1 they were, contrary to the ruling below, not subject to garnishment by a judgment creditor of the seller. Ginsberg v. Goldstein, 404 So.2d 1098 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). Hence the judgment below is reversed with directions to order the funds paid to the appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Estate of Bain v. Bibolini, 737 So. 2d 1238, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10420, 1999 WL 565096 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
737 So. 2d 1238 (Estate of Bain v. Bibolini) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
General R.A.C., Inc. v. Coldwell Banker Residential Real Estate, Inc.
876 So. 2d 606 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Pacer Technology v. Lee Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
737 So. 2d 1238 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)