Estate Development Company v. Oakland County Road Commission

746 N.W.2d 76, 480 Mich. 1137
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided March 24, 2008·No. 135554·Published

Opinion

746 N.W.2d 76 (2008)

ESTATE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
OAKLAND COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION, Defendant, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, and
Thompson-McCully Company, a/k/a Thompson-McCully Company, L.L.C., Third-Party Defendant, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and
Oakland Excavating Company, Owen Tree Service, and Ackley Construction, Third-Party Defendants.

Docket No. 135554. COA No. 273383.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

March 24, 2008.

*77 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 20, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court prior to the completion of the proceedings ordered by the Court of Appeals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Estate Development Company v. Oakland County Road Commission, 746 N.W.2d 76, 480 Mich. 1137 (Mich. 2008).

746 N.W.2d 76 (Estate Development Company v. Oakland County Road Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.