Estanislado Alvarez-Hernandez v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 2, 2023
Docket14-22-00901-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Estanislado Alvarez-Hernandez v. the State of Texas (Estanislado Alvarez-Hernandez v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Estanislado Alvarez-Hernandez v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 2, 2023

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00901-CR

ESTANISLADO ALVAREZ-HERNANDEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 338th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1616060

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Estanislado Alvarez-Hernandez appeals his conviction of super-aggravated sexual assault of a child. His sole issue on appeal alleges that trial counsel violated McCoy v. Louisiana, which prohibits defense counsel from conceding guilt over a defendant’s objection to maintain his innocence. 138 S. Ct. 1500, 1509 (2018). The Turner court addressed, inter alia, whether the defendant had preserved error on his McCoy complaint. Turner v. State, 570 S.W.3d 250, 275–76 (Tex. Crim. App. 2018). Although a defendant is not expected to object with the precision of an attorney, the court held that a defendant cannot remain silent before and during trial and raise a McCoy complaint for the first time after trial. Id. at 276. But see Harrison v. State, 595 S.W.3d 879, 885 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2020, pet. ref’d) (concluding that the defendant preserved error on her McCoy complaint by filing a motion for new trial at the first opportunity after learning about the trial court’s statement that deferred adjudication would not be considered). To preserve a McCoy complaint, a defendant must present “express statements of [his] will to maintain innocence.” Turner, 570 S.W.3d at 276.

Appellant acknowledges that he did not object to his trial counsel’s statements at trial. Likewise, the record does not indicate that appellant otherwise presented “express statements of [his] will to maintain innocence.” Id. Thus, appellant forfeited any error by failing to timely object. Id.; see also Tex. R. App. P. 33.1. Accordingly, appellant waived his sole issue on appeal. We overrule his sole issue and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

/s/ Frances Bourliot Justice

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Bourliot and Hassan. Do Not Publish — TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCoy v. Louisiana
584 U.S. 414 (Supreme Court, 2018)
Turner, Albert James
570 S.W.3d 250 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Estanislado Alvarez-Hernandez v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estanislado-alvarez-hernandez-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.