Estabrook v. Chamberlain
240 A.D. 1006
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1933·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
On reargument: Order denying motion for a peremptory mandamus order unanimously affirmed, without costs, as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion. The building zone ordinance was duly adopted. Order denying motion for resettlement of order of November 15, 1932, affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order denying motion for reargument of motion for peremptory mandamus order dismissed. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ. [See ante, p. 840.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Estabrook v. Chamberlain, 240 A.D. 1006 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).
240 A.D. 1006 (Estabrook v. Chamberlain) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rabasco v. Town of Greenburgh
285 A.D. 895 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1955)