Est v. Apted-Hulling, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Est v. Apted-Hulling, Inc.

880 S.W.2d 649, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1290, 1994 WL 411930

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 9, 1994·No. No. 65337·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Elsie Est, appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s decision finding appellant not permanently and totally disabled. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the Commission’s finding pursuant to Rule 84.-16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties here involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for the decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Elsie Est, appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s decision finding appellant not permanently and totally disabled. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the Commission’s finding pursuant to Rule 84.-16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties here involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for the decision.

Est v. Apted-Hulling, Inc., 880 S.W.2d 649, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1290, 1994 WL 411930 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

880 S.W.2d 649 (Est v. Apted-Hulling, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.