Est. of Ruth Garrett v. St. Thomas Hospital

CourtTennessee Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 21, 1998
Docket01S01-9710-CV-00218
StatusPublished

This text of Est. of Ruth Garrett v. St. Thomas Hospital (Est. of Ruth Garrett v. St. Thomas Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Est. of Ruth Garrett v. St. Thomas Hospital, (Tenn. 1998).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE

FILED December 21, 1998 FREDA G. MOON, EXECUTOR OF ) No. 01S01-9710-CV-00218 THE ESTATE OF RUTH GARRETT, ) Cecil W. Crowson ) Appellate Court Clerk PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT, ) ) v. ) DAVIDSON CIRCUIT No. 87C-239 ) ST. THOMAS HOSPITAL, ) ) DEFENDANT/APPELLEE. ) REVERSED AND REMANDED

JUDGMENT

This cause came on to be heard upon the record on appeal from the

Court of Appeals, briefs and argument of counsel; and upon consideration

thereof, this Court is of the opinion that the conflicting expert testimony as well as

the inferences to be drawn from the record create genuine issues of material fact

as to the standard of care and whether a deviation from the standard of care

occurred.

In accordance with the opinion filed herein, it is, therefore, ORDERED

AND ADJUDGED by this Court that the judgment of the Court of Appeals

affirming the trial court's granting the defendant's motion for summary judgment

be and the same is hereby reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court

for further proceedings.

The costs of this appeal are taxed to the defendant for which execution

may issue if necessary.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Est. of Ruth Garrett v. St. Thomas Hospital, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/est-of-ruth-garrett-v-st-thomas-hospital-tenn-1998.