Esswein v. Seigling

11 S.C. Eq. 600
CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedFebruary 15, 1837
StatusPublished

This text of 11 S.C. Eq. 600 (Esswein v. Seigling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Esswein v. Seigling, 11 S.C. Eq. 600 (S.C. Ct. App. 1837).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The case depends on testimony, and we are satisfied with the conclusion of the Chancellor. The decree is affirmed. Parties to pay their own costs.

Chancellor Johnston, dubitante.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 S.C. Eq. 600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/esswein-v-seigling-scctapp-1837.