Essoka v. Lynch

607 F. App'x 335
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 26, 2015·No. No. 14-2221·Published

Opinion

’ Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jean Roger Dalle Essoka, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion as untimely. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c) (2014). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Dalle Essoka (B.I.A. Oct. 8, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Essoka v. Lynch, 607 F. App'x 335 (4th Cir. 2015).

607 F. App'x 335 (Essoka v. Lynch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related