Esso Standard Oil Co. v. Marks

92 So. 2d 384, 231 La. 615, 1956 La. LEXIS 1559
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedDecember 10, 1956
DocketNo. 42718
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 92 So. 2d 384 (Esso Standard Oil Co. v. Marks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Esso Standard Oil Co. v. Marks, 92 So. 2d 384, 231 La. 615, 1956 La. LEXIS 1559 (La. 1956).

Opinions

SIMON, Justice.

This appeal involves the same parties and the same issues of law assigned in the case of Esso Standard Oil Company v. Jordan, 231 La. 594, 92 So.2d 377, and our findings therein are equally applicable and controlling here.

Accordingly, for the reasons assigned, the judgment of the trial court is amended to substitute Mrs. Hilda M. Hair and Mrs. Linda H. Sievers for the deceased R. W. Hair, and to substitute J. F. Vaughan, Testamentary Executor of E. R. Whitaker, for E. R. Whitaker.

In all other respects the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Esso Standard Oil Company v. Jordan
92 So. 2d 377 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 So. 2d 384, 231 La. 615, 1956 La. LEXIS 1559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/esso-standard-oil-co-v-marks-la-1956.