Essman v. Portsmouth

941 N.E.2d 802, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1544
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 16, 2011·No. 2010-2253·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Scioto App. No. 09CA3325, 2010-Ohio-4837. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 3 of the court of appeals’ Entry filed December 13, 2010:

“Does a political subdivision’s failure to upgrade an inadequate sewer system constitute a proprietary function within the meaning of R.C. 2744.01(G)(2)(d) so as to subject a political subdivision to liability under R.C. 2744.02(B)(2)?”
O’Donnell, J., dissents.

The conflict case is H. Hafner & Sons, Inc. v. Cincinnati Metro. Sewer Dist. (1997), 118 Ohio App.3d 792, 694 N.E.2d 111.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2010-1970, Essman v. Portsmouth, Scioto App. No. 09CA3325, 2010-Ohio-4837.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Essman v. Portsmouth, 941 N.E.2d 802, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1544 (Ohio 2011).

941 N.E.2d 802 (Essman v. Portsmouth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bauer v. Brunswick
2011 Ohio 4877 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2011)