Essex Systems Company, Inc. v. Abraham Steinberg, and Richard Harte

447 F.2d 1405
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedSeptember 30, 1971
Docket71-1076_1
StatusPublished

This text of 447 F.2d 1405 (Essex Systems Company, Inc. v. Abraham Steinberg, and Richard Harte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Essex Systems Company, Inc. v. Abraham Steinberg, and Richard Harte, 447 F.2d 1405 (2d Cir. 1971).

Opinion

447 F. 2d 1405

ESSEX SYSTEMS COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Abraham STEINBERG, Defendant, and Richard Harte et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 23, Docket 71-1076.

United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.

Argued Sept. 17, 1971.
Decided Sept. 30, 1971.

Alfred S. Julien, New York City (Julien, Glaser, Blitz & Schlesinger, New York City, Jesse A. Epstein, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Murray A. Gordon, New York City, for appellee Harte.

Mitchell Jelline, New York City, for appellees Reichman and Blue Ribbon Label Corp.

Before MOORE, SMITH and HAYS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Thomas F. Croake, Judge, filed December 17, 1970, denying the motion of appellant Essex Systems Company, Inc., for a preliminary injunction staying appellees from continuing to prosecute an action against appellant in a New Jersey state court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
447 F.2d 1405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/essex-systems-company-inc-v-abraham-steinberg-and-richard-harte-ca2-1971.