Essex Owners Corp. v. Barrett

15 A.D.3d 193, 788 N.Y.S.2d 610, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 947

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.), entered April 16, 2004, dismissing the complaint, after a nonjury trial, in an action by a residential cooperative against a putative tenant/shareholder to recover unpaid maintenance and other arrears, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The action was properly dismissed for lack of evidence sufficient to show, inter alia, that defendant was given notice that her maintenance was in arrears in accordance with the terms of the proprietary lease, when plaintiff foreclosed on the subject apartment, whether defendant was given notice of such foreclosure and whether the foreclosure sale was conducted in a commercially reasonable manner (cf. DeRosa v Chase Manhattan Mtge. Corp., 10 AD3d 317 [2004]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P, Ellerin, Nardelli, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Essex Owners Corp. v. Barrett, 15 A.D.3d 193, 788 N.Y.S.2d 610, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 947 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

15 A.D.3d 193 (Essex Owners Corp. v. Barrett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DeRosa v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp.
10 A.D.3d 317 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)