Essex Insurance v. Zota
This text of 408 F. App'x 323 (Essex Insurance v. Zota) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mercedes Zota, Lighthouse Intracoastal, Inc., Jack Farji, and Broward Executive Builders, Inc. appeal from a Final Declaratory Judgment in favor of Essex Insurance Company concluding that there is no coverage for Zota’s injury under the liability insurance policy issued by Essex to Lighthouse and therefore, Essex was not re[324]*324quired to indemnify Lighthouse or defend it with regard to Zota’s state court negligence action. Essex also cross-appeals several of the district court’s rulings.
After having carefully considered all of the issues in this case, including Essex’s cross-appeal, and based on the record and arguments of counsel, we find no reversible error.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
408 F. App'x 323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/essex-insurance-v-zota-ca11-2011.