Essex Insurance v. Zota

408 F. App'x 323
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedJanuary 18, 2011
DocketNo. 09-14026
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 408 F. App'x 323 (Essex Insurance v. Zota) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Essex Insurance v. Zota, 408 F. App'x 323 (11th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Mercedes Zota, Lighthouse Intracoastal, Inc., Jack Farji, and Broward Executive Builders, Inc. appeal from a Final Declaratory Judgment in favor of Essex Insurance Company concluding that there is no coverage for Zota’s injury under the liability insurance policy issued by Essex to Lighthouse and therefore, Essex was not re[324]*324quired to indemnify Lighthouse or defend it with regard to Zota’s state court negligence action. Essex also cross-appeals several of the district court’s rulings.

After having carefully considered all of the issues in this case, including Essex’s cross-appeal, and based on the record and arguments of counsel, we find no reversible error.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Regions Bank v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance
977 F. Supp. 2d 1237 (S.D. Florida, 2013)
Lemy v. Direct General Finance Co.
885 F. Supp. 2d 1265 (M.D. Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
408 F. App'x 323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/essex-insurance-v-zota-ca11-2011.