Essex Insurance v. Zota

408 F. App'x 323
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided January 18, 2011·No. No. 09-14026·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Mercedes Zota, Lighthouse Intracoastal, Inc., Jack Farji, and Broward Executive Builders, Inc. appeal from a Final Declaratory Judgment in favor of Essex Insurance Company concluding that there is no coverage for Zota’s injury under the liability insurance policy issued by Essex to Lighthouse and therefore, Essex was not re[324] quired to indemnify Lighthouse or defend it with regard to Zota’s state court negligence action. Essex also cross-appeals several of the district court’s rulings.

After having carefully considered all of the issues in this case, including Essex’s cross-appeal, and based on the record and arguments of counsel, we find no reversible error.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Essex Insurance v. Zota, 408 F. App'x 323 (11th Cir. 2011).

408 F. App'x 323 (Essex Insurance v. Zota) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Regions Bank v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance
977 F. Supp. 2d 1237 (S.D. Florida, 2013)
Lemy v. Direct General Finance Co.
885 F. Supp. 2d 1265 (M.D. Florida, 2012)