Essex Holding Corp. v. M. Lehman & Sons Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Essex Holding Corp. v. M. Lehman & Sons Co.

232 A.D. 689

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 232 A.D. 689 (Essex Holding Corp. v. M. Lehman & Sons Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Essex Holding Corp. v. M. Lehman & Sons Co., 232 A.D. 689 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Order fixing the damages sustained by the defendant by reason of the temporary injunction reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. This motion was premature. (Slingerland v. Albany Typographical Union, 115 App. Div. 15; Lockwood’s Dollar Cleaners, Inc., v. Lockwood, 137 Misc. 446; McGown v. Barnum, 42 id. 585.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order fixing the damages sustained by the defendant by reason of the temporary injunction reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. This motion was premature. (Slingerland v. Albany Typographical Union, 115 App. Div. 15; Lockwood’s Dollar Cleaners, Inc., v. Lockwood, 137 Misc. 446; McGown v. Barnum, 42 id. 585.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

232 A.D. 689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/essex-holding-corp-v-m-lehman-sons-co-nyappdiv-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack