Esquivel v. State

203 S.W. 1182
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 22, 1918·No. No. 5039·Published

Opinion

PRENDERGAST, J.

The conviction is for burglary, and the punishment assessed at two years’ confinement in the state penitentiary. Appellant entered a plea of guilty, and sought to obtain a suspended sentence. The facts proved are not brought up by the record, nor do we find any bills of exceptions. Motion for new trial complains of misconduct of the jury, but there is absence of any bills of exception or statement of facts disclosing the evidence upon which the trial judge overruled the motion. The record discloses no error, and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Esquivel v. State, 203 S.W. 1182 (Tex. 1918).

203 S.W. 1182 (Esquivel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.