Esquivel v. Guleria

Fourth Circuit

Esquivel v. Guleria

464 F. App'x 128

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 13, 2012

DocketNo. 11-7142

StatusPublished

This text of 464 F. App'x 128 (Esquivel v. Guleria) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Esquivel v. Guleria, 464 F. App'x 128 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Ricky Esquivel appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to prosecute. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Esquivel v. Guleria, No. 5:09-ct-03132-BO (E.D.N.C. July 21, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Ricky Esquivel appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to prosecute. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Esquivel v. Guleria, No. 5:09-ct-03132-BO (E.D.N.C. July 21, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

464 F. App'x 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/esquivel-v-guleria-ca4-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack