Esquivel (Teodomiro) v. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
TEODOMIRO ESQUIVEL, No. 83400 Appellant,
vs.
THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED
Respondent. FEB i 2022 eRowN PREME COU
DEPU CLERK
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a direct appeal from a judgment of conviction. Sixth Judicial District Court, Humboldt County; Michael Montero, Judge.
Appellant's counsel has filed a notice of voluntary withdrawal of this appeal. Counsel advises this court that he "personally talked to [appellant] and explained to him in detail the reasons for [dismissing this appeal] and why it has to be done and [appellant] concurs in [counsel's] judgment and requests that this appeal be dismissed." Cause appearing, we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.'
Silver
, J. Pi&lett , J.
Cadish Pickering 1111
'Because no remittitur will issue in this matter, see NRAP 42(b), the one-year period for filing a post-conviction habeas corpus petition under NRS 34.726(1) shall commence to run from the date of this order.
06 lot
cc: Hon. Michael Montero, District Judge Evenson Law Office Attorney General/Carson City Humboldt County District Attorney Humboldt County Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Esquivel (Teodomiro) v. State (Esquivel (Teodomiro) v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.