Esquivel (Teodomiro) v. State

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided February 24, 2022·No. 83400·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

TEODOMIRO ESQUIVEL, No. 83400 Appellant,

vs.

THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED

Respondent. FEB i 2022 eRowN PREME COU

DEPU CLERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a direct appeal from a judgment of conviction. Sixth Judicial District Court, Humboldt County; Michael Montero, Judge.

Appellant's counsel has filed a notice of voluntary withdrawal of this appeal. Counsel advises this court that he "personally talked to [appellant] and explained to him in detail the reasons for [dismissing this appeal] and why it has to be done and [appellant] concurs in [counsel's] judgment and requests that this appeal be dismissed." Cause appearing, we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.'

Silver

, J. Pi&lett , J.

Cadish Pickering 1111

'Because no remittitur will issue in this matter, see NRAP 42(b), the one-year period for filing a post-conviction habeas corpus petition under NRS 34.726(1) shall commence to run from the date of this order.

06 lot

cc: Hon. Michael Montero, District Judge Evenson Law Office Attorney General/Carson City Humboldt County District Attorney Humboldt County Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Esquivel (Teodomiro) v. State, (Neb. 2022).

Esquivel (Teodomiro) v. State (Esquivel (Teodomiro) v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 34.726
Nevada § 34.726