Esquiro v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Supreme Court

Esquiro v. Department of Revenue

969 P.2d 381, 328 Or. 37, 1998 Ore. LEXIS 1021

CourtOregon Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 27, 1998

DocketOTC 3954; SC S44128

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 969 P.2d 381 (Esquiro v. Department of Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Esquiro v. Department of Revenue, 969 P.2d 381, 328 Or. 37, 1998 Ore. LEXIS 1021 (Or. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

*39 PER CURIAM

This is an appeal from the Oregon Tax Court. Plaintiff (taxpayer) is a resident of the Warm Springs Indian Reservation in Oregon, but not a member of the Warm Springs Indian tribe. He is an enrolled member of a federally recognized American Indian tribe in Alaska. The narrow question on appeal is whether taxpayer may be subjected to Oregon income taxation on his income earned in Alaska. That income was not earned from activities carried out within Indian Country in Alaska.

The parties stipulated to the material facts. During 1990, taxpayer earned income from commercial fishing activities in Alaska. He fished as a private person with a commercial fishing license issued by Alaska and not pursuant to any special Indian or tribal fishing rights. The Tax Court found that taxpayer, as a nonmember of the Warm Springs Indian tribe, is not exempt from state income taxes imposed on income eamed outside the Warm Springs Indian Reservation and outside Oregon. Esquiro v. Dept. of Rev., 14 OTR 130, 135 (1997).

The facts of this case are such that publishing an extended opinion unlikely would benefit the bench, bar, or public. We have considered each of taxpayer’s arguments and have determined, as did the Tax Court, that none is well taken.

The judgment of the Oregon Tax Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*39 PER CURIAM

This is an appeal from the Oregon Tax Court. Plaintiff (taxpayer) is a resident of the Warm Springs Indian Reservation in Oregon, but not a member of the Warm Springs Indian tribe. He is an enrolled member of a federally recognized American Indian tribe in Alaska. The narrow question on appeal is whether taxpayer may be subjected to Oregon income taxation on his income earned in Alaska. That income was not earned from activities carried out within Indian Country in Alaska.

The parties stipulated to the material facts. During 1990, taxpayer earned income from commercial fishing activities in Alaska. He fished as a private person with a commercial fishing license issued by Alaska and not pursuant to any special Indian or tribal fishing rights. The Tax Court found that taxpayer, as a nonmember of the Warm Springs Indian tribe, is not exempt from state income taxes imposed on income eamed outside the Warm Springs Indian Reservation and outside Oregon. Esquiro v. Dept. of Rev., 14 OTR 130, 135 (1997).

The facts of this case are such that publishing an extended opinion unlikely would benefit the bench, bar, or public. We have considered each of taxpayer’s arguments and have determined, as did the Tax Court, that none is well taken.

The judgment of the Oregon Tax Court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

969 P.2d 381, 328 Or. 37, 1998 Ore. LEXIS 1021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/esquiro-v-department-of-revenue-or-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack