Esposito v. Motuzick, No. 29 49 89 (Feb. 17, 1994)

Connecticut Superior Court

Esposito v. Motuzick, No. 29 49 89 (Feb. 17, 1994)

1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 1690

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedFebruary 17, 1994

DocketNo. 29 49 89

StatusUnpublished

This text of 1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 1690 (Esposito v. Motuzick, No. 29 49 89 (Feb. 17, 1994)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Esposito v. Motuzick, No. 29 49 89 (Feb. 17, 1994), 1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 1690 (Colo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION This action proceeded on a hearing in damages. At the conclusion of the evidence this court ordered the plaintiff to submit a brief which was filed February 4, 1994.

From the evidence produced at trial and in accordance with the law recited in the brief to support the plaintiff's claims, the court finds that the plaintiff should recover the full costs of repair to the automobile. Our statutes regarding collateral source credits do not apply to personal property. [See Gorham v. Farmington Motor Inn, Inc., 159 Conn. 576]

Accordingly, judgment may enter in favor of the plaintiff for CT Page 1691 the sum of $5563.36 plus court costs.

Frank S. Meadow State Trial Referee

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION This action proceeded on a hearing in damages. At the conclusion of the evidence this court ordered the plaintiff to submit a brief which was filed February 4, 1994.

From the evidence produced at trial and in accordance with the law recited in the brief to support the plaintiff's claims, the court finds that the plaintiff should recover the full costs of repair to the automobile. Our statutes regarding collateral source credits do not apply to personal property. [See Gorham v. Farmington Motor Inn, Inc., 159 Conn. 576]

Accordingly, judgment may enter in favor of the plaintiff for CT Page 1691 the sum of $5563.36 plus court costs.

Frank S. Meadow State Trial Referee

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 1690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/esposito-v-motuzick-no-29-49-89-feb-17-1994-connsuperct-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack